Demographics details for Rio linda, CA vs Murfreesboro, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rio linda, CA vs Murfreesboro, TN.
Data | Rio linda | Murfreesboro |
---|---|---|
Population | 16,596 | 162,398 |
Median Age | 36.7 years | 31.5 years |
Median Income | $88,102 | $70,451 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Rio linda vs Murfreesboro
- The population in Murfreesboro is higher at 162,398, compared to 16,596 in Rio linda.
- Residents in Rio linda have a higher median age of 36.7 years compared to 31.5 years in Murfreesboro.
- Rio linda has a higher median income of $88,102 compared to $70,451 in Murfreesboro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rio linda at 41.0% compared to 34.0% in Murfreesboro.
- Rio linda has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Murfreesboro.
- The unemployment rate in Rio linda is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.0% in Murfreesboro.
Demographics
Demographics Rio linda vs Murfreesboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Rio linda | Murfreesboro |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 17 |
White | 60 | 66 |
Asian | 7 | 3 |
Hispanic | 23 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rio linda vs Murfreesboro
- In Murfreesboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 3% in Rio linda.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Murfreesboro at 66% compared to 60% in Rio linda.
- The Asian population is larger in Rio linda at 7% compared to 3% in Murfreesboro.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rio linda at 23% compared to 7% in Murfreesboro.
- Both Rio linda and Murfreesboro have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 7%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rio linda and Murfreesboro at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Rio linda | Murfreesboro |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 18.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 11.6% |
Depression | 21.4% | 26.5% |
Smoking | 15.8% | 18.3% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 15.5% |
Obesity | 33.7% | 34.8% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rio linda vs Murfreesboro
- More residents in Rio linda report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 18.1% in Murfreesboro.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Murfreesboro at 26.5% versus 21.4% in Rio linda.
- Murfreesboro has a higher smoking rate at 18.3% compared to 15.8% in Rio linda.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rio linda at 16.9% compared to 15.5% in Murfreesboro.
- Murfreesboro has higher obesity rates at 34.8% compared to 33.7% in Rio linda.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rio linda at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Murfreesboro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Rio linda | Murfreesboro |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (219) | 0.6% (920) |
High School Diploma | 25.4% (4,218) | 10.7% (17,362) |
Less than High School | 14.9% (2,471) | 6.2% (10,101) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (1,529) | 23.4% (38,019) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rio linda vs Murfreesboro
- A higher percentage of residents in Rio linda have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.6% in Murfreesboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rio linda hold a high school diploma at 25.4% compared to 10.7% in Murfreesboro.
- More residents in Rio linda have less than a high school education at 14.9% compared to 6.2% in Murfreesboro.
- In Murfreesboro, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 9.2% in Rio linda.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.