Demographics details for Rio linda, CA vs Iuka, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rio linda, CA vs Iuka, MS.
| Data | Rio linda | Iuka |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,596 | 3,096 |
| Median Age | 36.7 years | 37.2 years |
| Median Income | $88,102 | $43,887 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 22% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Rio linda vs Iuka
- In Rio linda, the population is higher at 16,596, compared to 3,096 in Iuka.
- The median age in Iuka is higher at 37.2 years, compared to 36.7 years in Rio linda.
- Rio linda has a higher median income of $88,102 compared to $43,887 in Iuka.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rio linda at 41.0% compared to 40.0% in Iuka.
- The poverty level is higher in Iuka at 22%, compared to 12% in Rio linda.
- Iuka has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.5% in Rio linda.
Demographics
Demographics Rio linda vs Iuka provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rio linda | Iuka |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 4 |
| White | 60 | 94 |
| Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 23 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rio linda vs Iuka
- In Iuka, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 3% in Rio linda.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Iuka at 94% compared to 60% in Rio linda.
- The Asian population is larger in Rio linda at 7% compared to 0% in Iuka.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rio linda at 23% compared to 0% in Iuka.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rio linda at 7% compared to 2% in Iuka.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rio linda and Iuka at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rio linda | Iuka |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 15.1% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 26.4% |
| Smoking | 15.8% | 25.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | 40.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rio linda vs Iuka
- In Iuka, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 18.2% in Rio linda.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Iuka at 26.4% versus 21.4% in Rio linda.
- Iuka has a higher smoking rate at 25.7% compared to 15.8% in Rio linda.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rio linda at 16.9% compared to 14.6% in Iuka.
- Iuka has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 33.7% in Rio linda.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Iuka at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Rio linda.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rio linda | Iuka |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (219) | 2.4% (75) |
| High School Diploma | 25.4% (4,218) | 19.9% (616) |
| Less than High School | 14.9% (2,471) | 21.0% (650) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (1,529) | 11.2% (348) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rio linda vs Iuka
- In Iuka, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 1.3% in Rio linda.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rio linda hold a high school diploma at 25.4% compared to 19.9% in Iuka.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Iuka at 21.0%, compared to 14.9% in Rio linda.
- In Iuka, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.2% compared to 9.2% in Rio linda.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.