Demographics details for Rio linda, CA vs Fairmont, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rio linda, CA vs Fairmont, NC.
| Data | Rio linda | Fairmont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,596 | 2,188 |
| Median Age | 36.7 years | 48.1 years |
| Median Income | $88,102 | $31,731 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 22% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Rio linda vs Fairmont
- In Rio linda, the population is higher at 16,596, compared to 2,188 in Fairmont.
- The median age in Fairmont is higher at 48.1 years, compared to 36.7 years in Rio linda.
- Rio linda has a higher median income of $88,102 compared to $31,731 in Fairmont.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rio linda at 41.0% compared to 25.0% in Fairmont.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairmont at 22%, compared to 12% in Rio linda.
- Fairmont has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.5% in Rio linda.
Demographics
Demographics Rio linda vs Fairmont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rio linda | Fairmont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 62 |
| White | 60 | 14 |
| Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 23 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 23 |
Demographics Comparison: Rio linda vs Fairmont
- In Fairmont, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 62% compared to 3% in Rio linda.
- Rio linda has a higher percentage of White residents at 60% compared to 14% in Fairmont.
- The Asian population is larger in Rio linda at 7% compared to 0% in Fairmont.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rio linda at 23% compared to 0% in Fairmont.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rio linda at 7% compared to 1% in Fairmont.
- In Fairmont, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 23%, compared to 0% in Rio linda.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rio linda | Fairmont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 19.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 16.4% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 15.8% | 26.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 12.7% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | 47.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rio linda vs Fairmont
- In Fairmont, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 18.2% in Rio linda.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fairmont at 22.6% versus 21.4% in Rio linda.
- Fairmont has a higher smoking rate at 26.0% compared to 15.8% in Rio linda.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rio linda at 16.9% compared to 12.7% in Fairmont.
- Fairmont has higher obesity rates at 47.2% compared to 33.7% in Rio linda.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairmont at 27.0% compared to 11.0% in Rio linda.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rio linda | Fairmont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (219) | 0.3% (7) |
| High School Diploma | 25.4% (4,218) | 27.5% (602) |
| Less than High School | 14.9% (2,471) | 12.9% (282) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (1,529) | 14.4% (316) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rio linda vs Fairmont
- A higher percentage of residents in Rio linda have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.3% in Fairmont.
- In Fairmont, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.5% compared to 25.4% in Rio linda.
- More residents in Rio linda have less than a high school education at 14.9% compared to 12.9% in Fairmont.
- In Fairmont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 9.2% in Rio linda.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.