Demographics details for Richville, MN vs Santa fe springs, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Richville, MN vs Santa fe springs, CA.

Data Richville Santa fe springs
Population 77 18,439
Median Age 46.5 years 38.0 years
Median Income $68,750 $81,500
Married Families 23.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 9% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.5

Population Comparison: Richville vs Santa fe springs

  • The population in Santa fe springs is higher at 18,439, compared to 77 in Richville.
  • Residents in Richville have a higher median age of 46.5 years compared to 38.0 years in Santa fe springs.
  • Santa fe springs has a higher median income of $81,500, compared to $68,750 in Richville.
  • In Santa fe springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 23.0% in Richville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Santa fe springs at 10%, compared to 9% in Richville.
  • Santa fe springs has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 3.5% in Richville.

Demographics

Demographics Richville vs Santa fe springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Richville Santa fe springs
Black Data is updating 4
White 100 -5
Asian Data is updating 8
Hispanic Data is updating 75
Two or More Races Data is updating 15
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Richville vs Santa fe springs

  • In Santa fe springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Richville.
  • Richville has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to -5% in Santa fe springs.
  • In Santa fe springs, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 0% in Richville.
  • Santa fe springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 0% in Richville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Santa fe springs at 15%, compared to 0% in Richville.
  • In Santa fe springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Richville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Richville Santa fe springs
Mental Health Not Good 15.8% 14.9%
Physical Health Not Good 10.4% 11.7%
Depression 23.8% 15.1%
Smoking 19.8% 10.0%
Binge Drinking 20.1% 15.7%
Obesity 38.1% 30.9%
Disability Percentage 22.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Richville vs Santa fe springs

  • More residents in Richville report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 14.9% in Santa fe springs.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Richville at 23.8% compared to 15.1% in Santa fe springs.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Richville at 19.8% compared to 10.0% in Santa fe springs.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Richville at 20.1% compared to 15.7% in Santa fe springs.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Richville at 38.1% compared to 30.9% in Santa fe springs.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Richville at 22.0% compared to 10.0% in Santa fe springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Richville Santa fe springs
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 3.5% (644)
High School Diploma 2.6% (2) 16.3% (3,011)
Less than High School 13.0% (10) 26.5% (4,883)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 1.3% (1) 15.5% (2,850)

Education Levels Comparison: Richville vs Santa fe springs

  • In Santa fe springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 0.0% in Richville.
  • In Santa fe springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.3% compared to 2.6% in Richville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Santa fe springs at 26.5%, compared to 13.0% in Richville.
  • In Santa fe springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 1.3% in Richville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.