Demographics details for Richville, MN vs Newark, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richville, MN vs Newark, NJ.
| Data | Richville | Newark |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 77 | 305,344 |
| Median Age | 46.5 years | 34.7 years |
| Median Income | $68,750 | $46,460 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 30% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 7.8 |
Population Comparison: Richville vs Newark
- The population in Newark is higher at 305,344, compared to 77 in Richville.
- Residents in Richville have a higher median age of 46.5 years compared to 34.7 years in Newark.
- Richville has a higher median income of $68,750 compared to $46,460 in Newark.
- In Newark, the percentage of married families is higher at 25.0%, compared to 23.0% in Richville.
- The poverty level is higher in Newark at 30%, compared to 9% in Richville.
- Newark has a higher unemployment rate at 7.8% compared to 3.5% in Richville.
Demographics
Demographics Richville vs Newark provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Richville | Newark |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 47 |
| White | 100 | 3 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 37 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Richville vs Newark
- In Newark, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 47% compared to 0% in Richville.
- Richville has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 3% in Newark.
- In Newark, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Richville.
- Newark has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 0% in Richville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Newark at 11%, compared to 0% in Richville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Richville and Newark at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Richville | Newark |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 14.8% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 18.2% |
| Smoking | 19.8% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.1% | 13.9% |
| Obesity | 38.1% | 38.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richville vs Newark
- In Newark, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 15.8% in Richville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Richville at 23.8% compared to 18.2% in Newark.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Richville at 19.8% compared to 19.5% in Newark.
- Binge drinking is more common in Richville at 20.1% compared to 13.9% in Newark.
- Newark has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 38.1% in Richville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Richville at 22.0% compared to 16.0% in Newark.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Richville | Newark |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.5% (7,516) |
| High School Diploma | 2.6% (2) | 21.9% (66,812) |
| Less than High School | 13.0% (10) | 24.1% (73,461) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 1.3% (1) | 11.1% (33,938) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richville vs Newark
- In Newark, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.0% in Richville.
- In Newark, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.9% compared to 2.6% in Richville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Newark at 24.1%, compared to 13.0% in Richville.
- In Newark, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.1% compared to 1.3% in Richville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.