Demographics details for Richville, MN vs Claremont, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richville, MN vs Claremont, CA.
| Data | Richville | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 77 | 36,001 |
| Median Age | 46.5 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $68,750 | $115,091 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Richville vs Claremont
- The population in Claremont is higher at 36,001, compared to 77 in Richville.
- Residents in Richville have a higher median age of 46.5 years compared to 41.5 years in Claremont.
- Claremont has a higher median income of $115,091, compared to $68,750 in Richville.
- In Claremont, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 23.0% in Richville.
- Richville has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 6% in Claremont.
- Claremont has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 3.5% in Richville.
Demographics
Demographics Richville vs Claremont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Richville | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 6 |
| White | 100 | 37 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 16 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 25 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Richville vs Claremont
- In Claremont, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Richville.
- Richville has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 37% in Claremont.
- In Claremont, the Asian population stands at 16%, greater than 0% in Richville.
- Claremont has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 0% in Richville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Claremont at 16%, compared to 0% in Richville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Richville and Claremont at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Richville | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 14.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 8.5% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 16.3% |
| Smoking | 19.8% | 8.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.1% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 38.1% | 24.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richville vs Claremont
- More residents in Richville report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 14.0% in Claremont.
- Depression is more prevalent in Richville at 23.8% compared to 16.3% in Claremont.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Richville at 19.8% compared to 8.2% in Claremont.
- Binge drinking is more common in Richville at 20.1% compared to 16.7% in Claremont.
- Obesity rates are higher in Richville at 38.1% compared to 24.5% in Claremont.
- Disability percentages are higher in Richville at 22.0% compared to 11.0% in Claremont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Richville | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.1% (403) |
| High School Diploma | 2.6% (2) | 6.7% (2,427) |
| Less than High School | 13.0% (10) | 6.2% (2,248) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 1.3% (1) | 39.5% (14,204) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richville vs Claremont
- In Claremont, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Richville.
- In Claremont, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 6.7% compared to 2.6% in Richville.
- More residents in Richville have less than a high school education at 13.0% compared to 6.2% in Claremont.
- In Claremont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.5% compared to 1.3% in Richville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.