Demographics details for Richton, MS vs Melvin, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richton, MS vs Melvin, IL.
Data | Richton | Melvin |
---|---|---|
Population | 902 | 411 |
Median Age | 42.3 years | 30.6 years |
Median Income | $33,621 | $50,000 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 16% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Richton vs Melvin
- In Richton, the population is higher at 902, compared to 411 in Melvin.
- Residents in Richton have a higher median age of 42.3 years compared to 30.6 years in Melvin.
- Melvin has a higher median income of $50,000, compared to $33,621 in Richton.
- In Melvin, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 35.0% in Richton.
- Richton has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 10% in Melvin.
- Melvin has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 3.5% in Richton.
Demographics
Demographics Richton vs Melvin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Richton | Melvin |
---|---|---|
Black | 32 | Data is updating |
White | 68 | 99 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Richton vs Melvin
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Richton at 32% compared to 0% in Melvin.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Melvin at 99% compared to 68% in Richton.
- Both Richton and Melvin have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Richton and Melvin at 0%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Melvin at 1%, compared to 0% in Richton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Richton and Melvin at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Richton | Melvin |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 16.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.8% | 11.1% |
Depression | 24.4% | 22.3% |
Smoking | 24.2% | 17.4% |
Binge Drinking | 13.2% | 17.9% |
Obesity | 42.8% | 36.4% |
Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richton vs Melvin
- More residents in Richton report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 16.3% in Melvin.
- Depression is more prevalent in Richton at 24.4% compared to 22.3% in Melvin.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Richton at 24.2% compared to 17.4% in Melvin.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Melvin at 17.9% compared to 13.2% in Richton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Richton at 42.8% compared to 36.4% in Melvin.
- Disability percentages are higher in Richton at 24.0% compared to 16.0% in Melvin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Richton | Melvin |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 4.2% (38) | 2.7% (11) |
High School Diploma | 26.9% (243) | 22.9% (94) |
Less than High School | 19.7% (178) | 14.1% (58) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.2% (137) | 11.2% (46) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richton vs Melvin
- A higher percentage of residents in Richton have no formal schooling at 4.2% compared to 2.7% in Melvin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richton hold a high school diploma at 26.9% compared to 22.9% in Melvin.
- More residents in Richton have less than a high school education at 19.7% compared to 14.1% in Melvin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.2% compared to 11.2% in Melvin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.