Demographics details for Richton, MS vs Laurel, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richton, MS vs Laurel, MD.
| Data | Richton | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 902 | 29,352 |
| Median Age | 42.3 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $33,621 | $92,035 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Richton vs Laurel
- The population in Laurel is higher at 29,352, compared to 902 in Richton.
- Residents in Richton have a higher median age of 42.3 years compared to 36.4 years in Laurel.
- Laurel has a higher median income of $92,035, compared to $33,621 in Richton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Richton at 35.0% compared to 33.0% in Laurel.
- Richton has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 9% in Laurel.
- The unemployment rate in Richton is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.4% in Laurel.
Demographics
Demographics Richton vs Laurel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Richton | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 32 | 52 |
| White | 68 | 11 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 10 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 18 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Richton vs Laurel
- In Laurel, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 52% compared to 32% in Richton.
- Richton has a higher percentage of White residents at 68% compared to 11% in Laurel.
- In Laurel, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 0% in Richton.
- Laurel has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 0% in Richton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Laurel at 8%, compared to 0% in Richton.
- In Laurel, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Richton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Richton | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 13.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.8% | 8.6% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 13.1% |
| Smoking | 24.2% | 10.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.2% | 12.4% |
| Obesity | 42.8% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richton vs Laurel
- More residents in Richton report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 13.1% in Laurel.
- Depression is more prevalent in Richton at 24.4% compared to 13.1% in Laurel.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Richton at 24.2% compared to 10.4% in Laurel.
- Binge drinking is more common in Richton at 13.2% compared to 12.4% in Laurel.
- Obesity rates are higher in Richton at 42.8% compared to 36.6% in Laurel.
- Disability percentages are higher in Richton at 24.0% compared to 7.0% in Laurel.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Richton | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.2% (38) | 1.8% (521) |
| High School Diploma | 26.9% (243) | 10.0% (2,934) |
| Less than High School | 19.7% (178) | 12.3% (3,616) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.2% (137) | 30.9% (9,081) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richton vs Laurel
- A higher percentage of residents in Richton have no formal schooling at 4.2% compared to 1.8% in Laurel.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richton hold a high school diploma at 26.9% compared to 10.0% in Laurel.
- More residents in Richton have less than a high school education at 19.7% compared to 12.3% in Laurel.
- In Laurel, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.9% compared to 15.2% in Richton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.