Demographics details for Richmond, VA vs Stuttgart, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richmond, VA vs Stuttgart, AR.
| Data | Richmond | Stuttgart |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 229,395 | 7,907 |
| Median Age | 34.5 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $59,606 | $59,124 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Richmond vs Stuttgart
- In Richmond, the population is higher at 229,395, compared to 7,907 in Stuttgart.
- The median age in Stuttgart is higher at 37.8 years, compared to 34.5 years in Richmond.
- Richmond has a higher median income of $59,606 compared to $59,124 in Stuttgart.
- In Stuttgart, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 25.0% in Richmond.
- The poverty level is higher in Stuttgart at 18%, compared to 14% in Richmond.
- Stuttgart has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Richmond.
Demographics
Demographics Richmond vs Stuttgart provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Richmond | Stuttgart |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 44 | 42 |
| White | 40 | 53 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Richmond vs Stuttgart
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Richmond at 44% compared to 42% in Stuttgart.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Stuttgart at 53% compared to 40% in Richmond.
- The Asian population is larger in Richmond at 2% compared to 0% in Stuttgart.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Richmond at 8% compared to 2% in Stuttgart.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Richmond at 6% compared to 3% in Stuttgart.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Richmond and Stuttgart at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Richmond | Stuttgart |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 19.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richmond vs Stuttgart
- In Stuttgart, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 18.8% in Richmond.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Stuttgart at 24.4% versus 21.4% in Richmond.
- Stuttgart has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 18.3% in Richmond.
- Binge drinking is more common in Richmond at 18.6% compared to 13.6% in Stuttgart.
- Stuttgart has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 34.4% in Richmond.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Stuttgart at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Richmond.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Richmond | Stuttgart |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (1,793) | 0.8% (63) |
| High School Diploma | 11.6% (26,718) | 25.5% (2,015) |
| Less than High School | 10.4% (23,891) | 14.5% (1,144) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.0% (70,999) | 12.0% (948) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richmond vs Stuttgart
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Richmond and Stuttgart at 0.8%.
- In Stuttgart, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.5% compared to 11.6% in Richmond.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Stuttgart at 14.5%, compared to 10.4% in Richmond.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richmond hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.0% compared to 12.0% in Stuttgart.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.