Demographics details for Richmond, VA vs La puente, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richmond, VA vs La puente, CA.
| Data | Richmond | La puente |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 229,395 | 36,636 |
| Median Age | 34.5 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $59,606 | $77,702 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: Richmond vs La puente
- In Richmond, the population is higher at 229,395, compared to 36,636 in La puente.
- The median age in La puente is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 34.5 years in Richmond.
- La puente has a higher median income of $77,702, compared to $59,606 in Richmond.
- In La puente, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 25.0% in Richmond.
- Richmond has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 12% in La puente.
- La puente has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 3.5% in Richmond.
Demographics
Demographics Richmond vs La puente provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Richmond | La puente |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 44 | 2 |
| White | 40 | -16 |
| Asian | 2 | 14 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 84 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Richmond vs La puente
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Richmond at 44% compared to 2% in La puente.
- Richmond has a higher percentage of White residents at 40% compared to -16% in La puente.
- In La puente, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 2% in Richmond.
- La puente has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 84%, compared to 8% in Richmond.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in La puente at 13%, compared to 6% in Richmond.
- In La puente, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Richmond.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Richmond | La puente |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 15.3% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 11.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 31.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richmond vs La puente
- More residents in Richmond report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 15.8% in La puente.
- Depression is more prevalent in Richmond at 21.4% compared to 15.3% in La puente.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Richmond at 18.3% compared to 11.8% in La puente.
- Binge drinking is more common in Richmond at 18.6% compared to 14.5% in La puente.
- Obesity rates are higher in Richmond at 34.4% compared to 31.6% in La puente.
- Disability percentages are higher in Richmond at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in La puente.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Richmond | La puente |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (1,793) | 5.0% (1,841) |
| High School Diploma | 11.6% (26,718) | 18.6% (6,830) |
| Less than High School | 10.4% (23,891) | 44.3% (16,244) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.0% (70,999) | 8.0% (2,926) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richmond vs La puente
- In La puente, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 5.0% compared to 0.8% in Richmond.
- In La puente, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.6% compared to 11.6% in Richmond.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in La puente at 44.3%, compared to 10.4% in Richmond.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richmond hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.0% compared to 8.0% in La puente.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.