Demographics details for Richmond, MO vs Taylorsville, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richmond, MO vs Taylorsville, UT.
Data | Richmond | Taylorsville |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,959 | 57,879 |
Median Age | 39.9 years | 33.7 years |
Median Income | $61,694 | $81,417 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Richmond vs Taylorsville
- The population in Taylorsville is higher at 57,879, compared to 5,959 in Richmond.
- Residents in Richmond have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 33.7 years in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher median income of $81,417, compared to $61,694 in Richmond.
- In Taylorsville, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 36.0% in Richmond.
- Richmond has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Richmond.
Demographics
Demographics Richmond vs Taylorsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Richmond | Taylorsville |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 1 |
White | 90 | 57 |
Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
Hispanic | 5 | 25 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 9 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Richmond vs Taylorsville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Richmond at 2% compared to 1% in Taylorsville.
- Richmond has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 57% in Taylorsville.
- In Taylorsville, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Richmond.
- Taylorsville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 5% in Richmond.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Taylorsville at 9%, compared to 2% in Richmond.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Richmond and Taylorsville at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Richmond | Taylorsville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 18.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 11.4% |
Depression | 26.0% | 27.2% |
Smoking | 23.7% | 10.0% |
Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 15.2% |
Obesity | 37.3% | 32.0% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richmond vs Taylorsville
- More residents in Richmond report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 18.8% in Taylorsville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Taylorsville at 27.2% versus 26.0% in Richmond.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Richmond at 23.7% compared to 10.0% in Taylorsville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Richmond at 17.4% compared to 15.2% in Taylorsville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Richmond at 37.3% compared to 32.0% in Taylorsville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Richmond at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Taylorsville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Richmond | Taylorsville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (17) | 1.2% (721) |
High School Diploma | 32.1% (1,910) | 16.9% (9,799) |
Less than High School | 15.1% (898) | 15.2% (8,775) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.8% (407) | 15.7% (9,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richmond vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Richmond.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richmond hold a high school diploma at 32.1% compared to 16.9% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Taylorsville at 15.2%, compared to 15.1% in Richmond.
- In Taylorsville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 6.8% in Richmond.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.