Demographics details for Richmond, MO vs Shelton, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richmond, MO vs Shelton, WA.
| Data | Richmond | Shelton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,959 | 10,814 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 31.2 years |
| Median Income | $61,694 | $57,907 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Richmond vs Shelton
- The population in Shelton is higher at 10,814, compared to 5,959 in Richmond.
- Residents in Richmond have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 31.2 years in Shelton.
- Richmond has a higher median income of $61,694 compared to $57,907 in Shelton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Richmond at 36.0% compared to 25.0% in Shelton.
- The poverty level is higher in Shelton at 12%, compared to 10% in Richmond.
- Shelton has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 3.5% in Richmond.
Demographics
Demographics Richmond vs Shelton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Richmond | Shelton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 90 | 61 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Richmond vs Shelton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Richmond at 2% compared to 1% in Shelton.
- Richmond has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 61% in Shelton.
- In Shelton, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Richmond.
- Shelton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 5% in Richmond.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Shelton at 9%, compared to 2% in Richmond.
- In Shelton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 1% in Richmond.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Richmond | Shelton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 20.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 15.5% |
| Depression | 26.0% | 29.0% |
| Smoking | 23.7% | 21.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 37.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richmond vs Shelton
- In Shelton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 19.0% in Richmond.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Shelton at 29.0% versus 26.0% in Richmond.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Richmond at 23.7% compared to 21.9% in Shelton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Richmond at 17.4% compared to 16.0% in Shelton.
- Shelton has higher obesity rates at 37.9% compared to 37.3% in Richmond.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Shelton at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Richmond.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Richmond | Shelton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (17) | 2.9% (318) |
| High School Diploma | 32.1% (1,910) | 14.3% (1,548) |
| Less than High School | 15.1% (898) | 18.4% (1,988) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.8% (407) | 11.2% (1,208) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richmond vs Shelton
- In Shelton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 0.3% in Richmond.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richmond hold a high school diploma at 32.1% compared to 14.3% in Shelton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shelton at 18.4%, compared to 15.1% in Richmond.
- In Shelton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.2% compared to 6.8% in Richmond.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.