Demographics details for Richmond, MO vs Norway, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richmond, MO vs Norway, MI.
| Data | Richmond | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,959 | 2,827 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 45.3 years |
| Median Income | $61,694 | $49,261 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Richmond vs Norway
- In Richmond, the population is higher at 5,959, compared to 2,827 in Norway.
- The median age in Norway is higher at 45.3 years, compared to 39.9 years in Richmond.
- Richmond has a higher median income of $61,694 compared to $49,261 in Norway.
- In Norway, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 36.0% in Richmond.
- The poverty level is higher in Norway at 15%, compared to 10% in Richmond.
- Norway has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Richmond.
Demographics
Demographics Richmond vs Norway provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Richmond | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 90 | 96 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Richmond vs Norway
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Richmond at 2% compared to 1% in Norway.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Norway at 96% compared to 90% in Richmond.
- Both Richmond and Norway have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Richmond at 5% compared to 0% in Norway.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Norway at 3%, compared to 2% in Richmond.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Richmond at 1% compared to 0% in Norway.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Richmond | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 10.2% |
| Depression | 26.0% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 23.7% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richmond vs Norway
- More residents in Richmond report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 16.9% in Norway.
- Depression is more prevalent in Richmond at 26.0% compared to 25.7% in Norway.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Richmond at 23.7% compared to 16.4% in Norway.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Norway at 19.1% compared to 17.4% in Richmond.
- Obesity rates are higher in Richmond at 37.3% compared to 34.9% in Norway.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Norway at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Richmond.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Richmond | Norway |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (17) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 32.1% (1,910) | 21.9% (618) |
| Less than High School | 15.1% (898) | 11.6% (329) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.8% (407) | 12.2% (346) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richmond vs Norway
- A higher percentage of residents in Richmond have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Norway.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richmond hold a high school diploma at 32.1% compared to 21.9% in Norway.
- More residents in Richmond have less than a high school education at 15.1% compared to 11.6% in Norway.
- In Norway, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.2% compared to 6.8% in Richmond.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.