Demographics details for Richmond, MO vs Fontana, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richmond, MO vs Fontana, CA.
| Data | Richmond | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,959 | 212,475 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $61,694 | $93,230 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Richmond vs Fontana
- The population in Fontana is higher at 212,475, compared to 5,959 in Richmond.
- Residents in Richmond have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 32.6 years in Fontana.
- Fontana has a higher median income of $93,230, compared to $61,694 in Richmond.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Richmond and Fontana at 36.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Fontana at 13%, compared to 10% in Richmond.
- Fontana has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Richmond.
Demographics
Demographics Richmond vs Fontana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Richmond | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 8 |
| White | 90 | 2 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 68 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 14 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Richmond vs Fontana
- In Fontana, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 2% in Richmond.
- Richmond has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 2% in Fontana.
- In Fontana, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Richmond.
- Fontana has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 68%, compared to 5% in Richmond.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fontana at 14%, compared to 2% in Richmond.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Richmond and Fontana at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Richmond | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 26.0% | 17.0% |
| Smoking | 23.7% | 12.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 38.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richmond vs Fontana
- More residents in Richmond report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 16.2% in Fontana.
- Depression is more prevalent in Richmond at 26.0% compared to 17.0% in Fontana.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Richmond at 23.7% compared to 12.4% in Fontana.
- Binge drinking is more common in Richmond at 17.4% compared to 15.1% in Fontana.
- Fontana has higher obesity rates at 38.6% compared to 37.3% in Richmond.
- Disability percentages are higher in Richmond at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Fontana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Richmond | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (17) | 2.2% (4,748) |
| High School Diploma | 32.1% (1,910) | 16.3% (34,556) |
| Less than High School | 15.1% (898) | 25.3% (53,655) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.8% (407) | 12.0% (25,587) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richmond vs Fontana
- In Fontana, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.3% in Richmond.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richmond hold a high school diploma at 32.1% compared to 16.3% in Fontana.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fontana at 25.3%, compared to 15.1% in Richmond.
- In Fontana, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.0% compared to 6.8% in Richmond.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.