Demographics details for Richmond, MO vs Cudahy, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richmond, MO vs Cudahy, WI.
| Data | Richmond | Cudahy |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,959 | 17,796 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 42.4 years |
| Median Income | $61,694 | $66,592 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Richmond vs Cudahy
- The population in Cudahy is higher at 17,796, compared to 5,959 in Richmond.
- The median age in Cudahy is higher at 42.4 years, compared to 39.9 years in Richmond.
- Cudahy has a higher median income of $66,592, compared to $61,694 in Richmond.
- In Cudahy, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 36.0% in Richmond.
- The poverty level is higher in Cudahy at 11%, compared to 10% in Richmond.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Richmond and Cudahy at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Richmond vs Cudahy provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Richmond | Cudahy |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 3 |
| White | 90 | 77 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Richmond vs Cudahy
- In Cudahy, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Richmond.
- Richmond has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 77% in Cudahy.
- In Cudahy, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Richmond.
- Cudahy has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 5% in Richmond.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cudahy at 9%, compared to 2% in Richmond.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Richmond at 1% compared to 0% in Cudahy.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Richmond | Cudahy |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 26.0% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 23.7% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 26.4% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 34.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richmond vs Cudahy
- More residents in Richmond report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 15.5% in Cudahy.
- Depression is more prevalent in Richmond at 26.0% compared to 24.3% in Cudahy.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Richmond at 23.7% compared to 16.4% in Cudahy.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cudahy at 26.4% compared to 17.4% in Richmond.
- Obesity rates are higher in Richmond at 37.3% compared to 34.2% in Cudahy.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cudahy at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Richmond.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Richmond | Cudahy |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (17) | 0.9% (166) |
| High School Diploma | 32.1% (1,910) | 25.1% (4,460) |
| Less than High School | 15.1% (898) | 9.9% (1,768) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.8% (407) | 21.0% (3,730) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richmond vs Cudahy
- In Cudahy, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.3% in Richmond.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richmond hold a high school diploma at 32.1% compared to 25.1% in Cudahy.
- More residents in Richmond have less than a high school education at 15.1% compared to 9.9% in Cudahy.
- In Cudahy, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.0% compared to 6.8% in Richmond.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.