Demographics details for Richmond, CA vs Farmington, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richmond, CA vs Farmington, CT.
Data | Richmond | Farmington |
---|---|---|
Population | 216,288 | 25,340 |
Median Age | 36.0 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $73,000 | $101,000 |
Married Families | 40000.0% | 65.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 3% |
Unemployment Rate | 0.08 | 2.0 |
Population Comparison: Richmond vs Farmington
- In Richmond, the population is higher at 216,288, compared to 25,340 in Farmington.
- The median age in Farmington is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 36.0 years in Richmond.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $101,000, compared to $73,000 in Richmond.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Richmond at 40000.0% compared to 65.0% in Farmington.
- The poverty level is higher in Farmington at 3%, compared to 0% in Richmond.
- Farmington has a higher unemployment rate at 2.0% compared to 0.08% in Richmond.
Demographics
Demographics Richmond vs Farmington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Richmond | Farmington |
---|---|---|
Black | 30 | 5 |
White | 36 | 85 |
Asian | 14 | 5 |
Hispanic | 20 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Richmond vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Richmond at 30% compared to 5% in Farmington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Farmington at 85% compared to 36% in Richmond.
- The Asian population is larger in Richmond at 14% compared to 5% in Farmington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Richmond at 20% compared to 5% in Farmington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Richmond at 5% compared to 0% in Farmington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Richmond and Farmington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Richmond | Farmington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | Data is updating% |
Depression | Data is updating% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richmond vs Farmington
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Richmond and Farmington at 0.0%.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 0.0%.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Richmond and Farmington at 0.0%.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Richmond and Farmington at 0.0%.
- Both cities have the same obesity rates at 0.0%.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Richmond and Farmington at 0.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Richmond | Farmington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richmond vs Farmington
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Richmond and Farmington at 0.0%.
- Both cities have the same percentage of residents with high school diplomas at 0.0%.
- Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 0.0%.
- The percentage of residents with a bachelor's degree or higher is identical in both Richmond and Farmington at 0.0%.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.