Demographics details for Richmond hill, GA vs Crawford, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richmond hill, GA vs Crawford, TX.
Data | Richmond hill | Crawford |
---|---|---|
Population | 18,091 | 913 |
Median Age | 31.0 years | 44.1 years |
Median Income | $83,519 | $78,333 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 54.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Richmond hill vs Crawford
- In Richmond hill, the population is higher at 18,091, compared to 913 in Crawford.
- The median age in Crawford is higher at 44.1 years, compared to 31.0 years in Richmond hill.
- Richmond hill has a higher median income of $83,519 compared to $78,333 in Crawford.
- In Crawford, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 35.0% in Richmond hill.
- Richmond hill has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Crawford.
- Crawford has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Richmond hill.
Demographics
Demographics Richmond hill vs Crawford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Richmond hill | Crawford |
---|---|---|
Black | 13 | 2 |
White | 66 | 88 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 11 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Richmond hill vs Crawford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Richmond hill at 13% compared to 2% in Crawford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Crawford at 88% compared to 66% in Richmond hill.
- The Asian population is larger in Richmond hill at 2% compared to 0% in Crawford.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Richmond hill at 11% compared to 7% in Crawford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Richmond hill at 8% compared to 3% in Crawford.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Richmond hill and Crawford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Richmond hill | Crawford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 16.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 9.6% |
Depression | 21.8% | 24.1% |
Smoking | 14.2% | 13.1% |
Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 20.0% |
Obesity | 34.4% | 33.5% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richmond hill vs Crawford
- In Crawford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 15.9% in Richmond hill.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Crawford at 24.1% versus 21.8% in Richmond hill.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Richmond hill at 14.2% compared to 13.1% in Crawford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Crawford at 20.0% compared to 16.2% in Richmond hill.
- Obesity rates are higher in Richmond hill at 34.4% compared to 33.5% in Crawford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Crawford at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Richmond hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Richmond hill | Crawford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (9) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 7.7% (1,395) | 28.7% (262) |
Less than High School | 5.7% (1,037) | 3.5% (32) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.5% (3,532) | 11.5% (105) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richmond hill vs Crawford
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Richmond hill and Crawford at 0.0%.
- In Crawford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.7% compared to 7.7% in Richmond hill.
- More residents in Richmond hill have less than a high school education at 5.7% compared to 3.5% in Crawford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richmond hill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.5% compared to 11.5% in Crawford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.