Demographics details for Richmond hill, GA vs Caneyville, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Richmond hill, GA vs Caneyville, KY.

Data Richmond hill Caneyville
Population 18,091 529
Median Age 31.0 years 33.2 years
Median Income $83,519 $42,212
Married Families 35.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 10% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.5

Population Comparison: Richmond hill vs Caneyville

  • In Richmond hill, the population is higher at 18,091, compared to 529 in Caneyville.
  • The median age in Caneyville is higher at 33.2 years, compared to 31.0 years in Richmond hill.
  • Richmond hill has a higher median income of $83,519 compared to $42,212 in Caneyville.
  • In Caneyville, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 35.0% in Richmond hill.
  • The poverty level is higher in Caneyville at 12%, compared to 10% in Richmond hill.
  • Caneyville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Richmond hill.

Demographics

Demographics Richmond hill vs Caneyville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Richmond hill Caneyville
Black 13 Data is updating
White 66 88
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 11 1
Two or More Races 8 11
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Richmond hill vs Caneyville

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Richmond hill at 13% compared to 0% in Caneyville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Caneyville at 88% compared to 66% in Richmond hill.
  • The Asian population is larger in Richmond hill at 2% compared to 0% in Caneyville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Richmond hill at 11% compared to 1% in Caneyville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Caneyville at 11%, compared to 8% in Richmond hill.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Richmond hill and Caneyville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Richmond hill Caneyville
Mental Health Not Good 15.9% 22.8%
Physical Health Not Good 10.6% 17.9%
Depression 21.8% 32.2%
Smoking 14.2% 29.7%
Binge Drinking 16.2% 13.7%
Obesity 34.4% 41.7%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 21.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Richmond hill vs Caneyville

  • In Caneyville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.8% compared to 15.9% in Richmond hill.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Caneyville at 32.2% versus 21.8% in Richmond hill.
  • Caneyville has a higher smoking rate at 29.7% compared to 14.2% in Richmond hill.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Richmond hill at 16.2% compared to 13.7% in Caneyville.
  • Caneyville has higher obesity rates at 41.7% compared to 34.4% in Richmond hill.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Caneyville at 21.0% compared to 9.0% in Richmond hill.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Richmond hill Caneyville
No Schooling 0.0% (9) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 7.7% (1,395) 22.1% (117)
Less than High School 5.7% (1,037) 20.8% (110)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.5% (3,532) 16.3% (86)

Education Levels Comparison: Richmond hill vs Caneyville

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Richmond hill and Caneyville at 0.0%.
  • In Caneyville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.1% compared to 7.7% in Richmond hill.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Caneyville at 20.8%, compared to 5.7% in Richmond hill.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Richmond hill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.5% compared to 16.3% in Caneyville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.