Demographics details for Richlands, NC vs Strum, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richlands, NC vs Strum, WI.
| Data | Richlands | Strum |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,355 | 1,068 |
| Median Age | 28.9 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $59,333 | $64,911 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Richlands vs Strum
- In Richlands, the population is higher at 2,355, compared to 1,068 in Strum.
- The median age in Strum is higher at 33.7 years, compared to 28.9 years in Richlands.
- Strum has a higher median income of $64,911, compared to $59,333 in Richlands.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Richlands and Strum at 41.0%.
- Richlands has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Strum.
- The unemployment rate in Richlands is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.5% in Strum.
Demographics
Demographics Richlands vs Strum provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Richlands | Strum |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | Data is updating |
| White | 65 | 91 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Richlands vs Strum
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Richlands at 17% compared to 0% in Strum.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Strum at 91% compared to 65% in Richlands.
- Both Richlands and Strum have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Richlands at 10% compared to 4% in Strum.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Richlands at 7% compared to 3% in Strum.
- In Strum, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Richlands.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Richlands | Strum |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 14.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 23.2% |
| Smoking | 16.6% | 15.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 24.8% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 35.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richlands vs Strum
- More residents in Richlands report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 14.7% in Strum.
- Depression is more prevalent in Richlands at 23.5% compared to 23.2% in Strum.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Richlands at 16.6% compared to 15.7% in Strum.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Strum at 24.8% compared to 17.4% in Richlands.
- Obesity rates are higher in Richlands at 36.7% compared to 35.0% in Strum.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Strum at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Richlands.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Richlands | Strum |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (20) | 0.7% (7) |
| High School Diploma | 18.9% (445) | 23.6% (252) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (273) | 4.5% (48) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.3% (408) | 14.5% (155) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richlands vs Strum
- A higher percentage of residents in Richlands have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.7% in Strum.
- In Strum, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.6% compared to 18.9% in Richlands.
- More residents in Richlands have less than a high school education at 11.6% compared to 4.5% in Strum.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richlands hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 14.5% in Strum.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.