Demographics details for Richlands, NC vs Sloatsburg, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richlands, NC vs Sloatsburg, NY.
| Data | Richlands | Sloatsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,355 | 3,008 |
| Median Age | 28.9 years | 43.7 years |
| Median Income | $59,333 | $104,602 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 2% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Richlands vs Sloatsburg
- The population in Sloatsburg is higher at 3,008, compared to 2,355 in Richlands.
- The median age in Sloatsburg is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 28.9 years in Richlands.
- Sloatsburg has a higher median income of $104,602, compared to $59,333 in Richlands.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Richlands at 41.0% compared to 40.0% in Sloatsburg.
- Richlands has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 2% in Sloatsburg.
- The unemployment rate in Richlands is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Sloatsburg.
Demographics
Demographics Richlands vs Sloatsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Richlands | Sloatsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 6 |
| White | 65 | 63 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Richlands vs Sloatsburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Richlands at 17% compared to 6% in Sloatsburg.
- Richlands has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 63% in Sloatsburg.
- In Sloatsburg, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Richlands.
- Sloatsburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 10% in Richlands.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sloatsburg at 9%, compared to 7% in Richlands.
- In Sloatsburg, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Richlands.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Richlands | Sloatsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 12.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 7.9% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 18.6% |
| Smoking | 16.6% | 12.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 23.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richlands vs Sloatsburg
- More residents in Richlands report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 12.5% in Sloatsburg.
- Depression is more prevalent in Richlands at 23.5% compared to 18.6% in Sloatsburg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Richlands at 16.6% compared to 12.0% in Sloatsburg.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Richlands and Sloatsburg at 17.4%.
- Obesity rates are higher in Richlands at 36.7% compared to 23.9% in Sloatsburg.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sloatsburg at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Richlands.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Richlands | Sloatsburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (20) | 0.4% (11) |
| High School Diploma | 18.9% (445) | 17.4% (524) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (273) | 6.7% (202) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.3% (408) | 30.3% (912) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richlands vs Sloatsburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Richlands have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Sloatsburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richlands hold a high school diploma at 18.9% compared to 17.4% in Sloatsburg.
- More residents in Richlands have less than a high school education at 11.6% compared to 6.7% in Sloatsburg.
- In Sloatsburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.3% compared to 17.3% in Richlands.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.