Demographics details for Richlands, NC vs North port, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richlands, NC vs North port, FL.
Data | Richlands | North port |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,355 | 85,099 |
Median Age | 28.9 years | 49.5 years |
Median Income | $59,333 | $78,815 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Richlands vs North port
- The population in North port is higher at 85,099, compared to 2,355 in Richlands.
- The median age in North port is higher at 49.5 years, compared to 28.9 years in Richlands.
- North port has a higher median income of $78,815, compared to $59,333 in Richlands.
- In North port, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 41.0% in Richlands.
- The poverty level is higher in North port at 11%, compared to 9% in Richlands.
- The unemployment rate in Richlands is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.0% in North port.
Demographics
Demographics Richlands vs North port provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Richlands | North port |
---|---|---|
Black | 17 | 5 |
White | 65 | 79 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 10 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Richlands vs North port
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Richlands at 17% compared to 5% in North port.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in North port at 79% compared to 65% in Richlands.
- Both Richlands and North port have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Richlands at 10% compared to 9% in North port.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Richlands at 7% compared to 6% in North port.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Richlands and North port at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Richlands | North port |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 16.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 10.4% |
Depression | 23.5% | 20.9% |
Smoking | 16.6% | 19.0% |
Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 18.4% |
Obesity | 36.7% | 27.1% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richlands vs North port
- In North port, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.5% in Richlands.
- Depression is more prevalent in Richlands at 23.5% compared to 20.9% in North port.
- North port has a higher smoking rate at 19.0% compared to 16.6% in Richlands.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in North port at 18.4% compared to 17.4% in Richlands.
- Obesity rates are higher in Richlands at 36.7% compared to 27.1% in North port.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in North port at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Richlands.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Richlands | North port |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (20) | 0.6% (473) |
High School Diploma | 18.9% (445) | 16.1% (13,678) |
Less than High School | 11.6% (273) | 10.1% (8,628) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.3% (408) | 18.0% (15,350) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richlands vs North port
- A higher percentage of residents in Richlands have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.6% in North port.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richlands hold a high school diploma at 18.9% compared to 16.1% in North port.
- More residents in Richlands have less than a high school education at 11.6% compared to 10.1% in North port.
- In North port, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.0% compared to 17.3% in Richlands.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.