Demographics details for Richlands, NC vs Marshall, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richlands, NC vs Marshall, TX.
| Data | Richlands | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,355 | 23,641 |
| Median Age | 28.9 years | 34.1 years |
| Median Income | $59,333 | $49,162 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Richlands vs Marshall
- The population in Marshall is higher at 23,641, compared to 2,355 in Richlands.
- The median age in Marshall is higher at 34.1 years, compared to 28.9 years in Richlands.
- Richlands has a higher median income of $59,333 compared to $49,162 in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Richlands at 41.0% compared to 27.0% in Marshall.
- The poverty level is higher in Marshall at 17%, compared to 9% in Richlands.
- Marshall has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.5% in Richlands.
Demographics
Demographics Richlands vs Marshall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Richlands | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 40 |
| White | 65 | 28 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Richlands vs Marshall
- In Marshall, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 17% in Richlands.
- Richlands has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 28% in Marshall.
- Both Richlands and Marshall have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Marshall has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 10% in Richlands.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Marshall at 11%, compared to 7% in Richlands.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Richlands and Marshall at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Richlands | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 22.7% |
| Smoking | 16.6% | 21.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 42.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richlands vs Marshall
- In Marshall, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 16.5% in Richlands.
- Depression is more prevalent in Richlands at 23.5% compared to 22.7% in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher smoking rate at 21.0% compared to 16.6% in Richlands.
- Binge drinking is more common in Richlands at 17.4% compared to 16.2% in Marshall.
- Marshall has higher obesity rates at 42.0% compared to 36.7% in Richlands.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Marshall at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Richlands.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Richlands | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (20) | 0.8% (195) |
| High School Diploma | 18.9% (445) | 18.7% (4,412) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (273) | 10.7% (2,527) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.3% (408) | 13.2% (3,127) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richlands vs Marshall
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Richlands and Marshall at 0.8%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richlands hold a high school diploma at 18.9% compared to 18.7% in Marshall.
- More residents in Richlands have less than a high school education at 11.6% compared to 10.7% in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richlands hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 13.2% in Marshall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.