Demographics details for Richland, MS vs Westminster, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richland, MS vs Westminster, CO.
| Data | Richland | Westminster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,297 | 114,533 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $54,753 | $90,651 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Richland vs Westminster
- The population in Westminster is higher at 114,533, compared to 7,297 in Richland.
- The median age in Westminster is higher at 37.4 years, compared to 37.1 years in Richland.
- Westminster has a higher median income of $90,651, compared to $54,753 in Richland.
- In Westminster, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 40.0% in Richland.
- Richland has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Westminster.
- The unemployment rate in Richland is higher at 4.2%, compared to 4.1% in Westminster.
Demographics
Demographics Richland vs Westminster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Richland | Westminster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 19 | 1 |
| White | 74 | 58 |
| Asian | 2 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 24 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Richland vs Westminster
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Richland at 19% compared to 1% in Westminster.
- Richland has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 58% in Westminster.
- In Westminster, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 2% in Richland.
- Westminster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 3% in Richland.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Westminster at 11%, compared to 2% in Richland.
- In Westminster, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Richland.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Richland | Westminster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 21.1% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 13.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 21.5% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 26.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richland vs Westminster
- More residents in Richland report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 14.2% in Westminster.
- Depression is more prevalent in Richland at 23.4% compared to 21.1% in Westminster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Richland at 19.3% compared to 13.5% in Westminster.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Westminster at 21.5% compared to 14.2% in Richland.
- Obesity rates are higher in Richland at 37.4% compared to 26.9% in Westminster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Richland at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Westminster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Richland | Westminster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (122) | 0.9% (1,007) |
| High School Diploma | 12.6% (916) | 11.9% (13,626) |
| Less than High School | 10.0% (732) | 10.3% (11,853) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.1% (1,175) | 30.3% (34,676) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richland vs Westminster
- A higher percentage of residents in Richland have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.9% in Westminster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richland hold a high school diploma at 12.6% compared to 11.9% in Westminster.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Westminster at 10.3%, compared to 10.0% in Richland.
- In Westminster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.3% compared to 16.1% in Richland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.