Demographics details for Richland, MS vs West covina, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richland, MS vs West covina, CA.
| Data | Richland | West covina |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,297 | 105,013 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 39.8 years |
| Median Income | $54,753 | $96,219 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Richland vs West covina
- The population in West covina is higher at 105,013, compared to 7,297 in Richland.
- The median age in West covina is higher at 39.8 years, compared to 37.1 years in Richland.
- West covina has a higher median income of $96,219, compared to $54,753 in Richland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Richland at 40.0% compared to 39.0% in West covina.
- The poverty level is higher in West covina at 13%, compared to 12% in Richland.
- West covina has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 4.2% in Richland.
Demographics
Demographics Richland vs West covina provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Richland | West covina |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 19 | 4 |
| White | 74 | -5 |
| Asian | 2 | 30 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 55 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Richland vs West covina
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Richland at 19% compared to 4% in West covina.
- Richland has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to -5% in West covina.
- In West covina, the Asian population stands at 30%, greater than 2% in Richland.
- West covina has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 55%, compared to 3% in Richland.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in West covina at 15%, compared to 2% in Richland.
- In West covina, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Richland.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Richland | West covina |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 13.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 13.7% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 9.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 25.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richland vs West covina
- More residents in Richland report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 13.7% in West covina.
- Depression is more prevalent in Richland at 23.4% compared to 13.7% in West covina.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Richland at 19.3% compared to 9.3% in West covina.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in West covina at 14.4% compared to 14.2% in Richland.
- Obesity rates are higher in Richland at 37.4% compared to 25.8% in West covina.
- Disability percentages are higher in Richland at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in West covina.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Richland | West covina |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (122) | 2.6% (2,712) |
| High School Diploma | 12.6% (916) | 18.1% (19,047) |
| Less than High School | 10.0% (732) | 17.0% (17,801) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.1% (1,175) | 21.8% (22,904) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richland vs West covina
- In West covina, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 1.7% in Richland.
- In West covina, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.1% compared to 12.6% in Richland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in West covina at 17.0%, compared to 10.0% in Richland.
- In West covina, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.8% compared to 16.1% in Richland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.