Demographics details for Richland, MS vs Sterling, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richland, MS vs Sterling, CT.
| Data | Richland | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,297 | 3,830 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $54,753 | $85,000 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 80.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Richland vs Sterling
- In Richland, the population is higher at 7,297, compared to 3,830 in Sterling.
- The median age in Sterling is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 37.1 years in Richland.
- Sterling has a higher median income of $85,000, compared to $54,753 in Richland.
- In Sterling, the percentage of married families is higher at 80.0%, compared to 40.0% in Richland.
- Richland has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Sterling.
- The unemployment rate in Richland is higher at 4.2%, compared to 2.9% in Sterling.
Demographics
Demographics Richland vs Sterling provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Richland | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 19 | 2 |
| White | 74 | 95 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Richland vs Sterling
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Richland at 19% compared to 2% in Sterling.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sterling at 95% compared to 74% in Richland.
- The Asian population is larger in Richland at 2% compared to 1% in Sterling.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Richland at 3% compared to 2% in Sterling.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Richland at 2% compared to 0% in Sterling.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Richland and Sterling at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Richland | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 23.4% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richland vs Sterling
- More residents in Richland report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- Depression is more prevalent in Richland at 23.4% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Richland at 19.3% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- Binge drinking is more common in Richland at 14.2% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- Obesity rates are higher in Richland at 37.4% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- Disability percentages are higher in Richland at 13.0% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Richland | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (122) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 12.6% (916) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 10.0% (732) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.1% (1,175) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richland vs Sterling
- A higher percentage of residents in Richland have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richland hold a high school diploma at 12.6% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- More residents in Richland have less than a high school education at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.1% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.