Demographics details for Richland, MS vs Saratoga, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richland, MS vs Saratoga, CA.
| Data | Richland | Saratoga |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,297 | 29,903 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 50.9 years |
| Median Income | $54,753 | $237,730 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 60.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Richland vs Saratoga
- The population in Saratoga is higher at 29,903, compared to 7,297 in Richland.
- The median age in Saratoga is higher at 50.9 years, compared to 37.1 years in Richland.
- Saratoga has a higher median income of $237,730, compared to $54,753 in Richland.
- In Saratoga, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 40.0% in Richland.
- Richland has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Saratoga.
- Saratoga has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 4.2% in Richland.
Demographics
Demographics Richland vs Saratoga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Richland | Saratoga |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 19 | Data is updating |
| White | 74 | 36 |
| Asian | 2 | 57 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Richland vs Saratoga
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Richland at 19% compared to 0% in Saratoga.
- Richland has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 36% in Saratoga.
- In Saratoga, the Asian population stands at 57%, greater than 2% in Richland.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Richland at 3% compared to 2% in Saratoga.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Saratoga at 5%, compared to 2% in Richland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Richland and Saratoga at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Richland | Saratoga |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 10.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 5.9% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 13.5% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 5.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 14.0% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 15.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richland vs Saratoga
- More residents in Richland report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 10.6% in Saratoga.
- Depression is more prevalent in Richland at 23.4% compared to 13.5% in Saratoga.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Richland at 19.3% compared to 5.3% in Saratoga.
- Binge drinking is more common in Richland at 14.2% compared to 14.0% in Saratoga.
- Obesity rates are higher in Richland at 37.4% compared to 15.7% in Saratoga.
- Disability percentages are higher in Richland at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Saratoga.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Richland | Saratoga |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (122) | 0.5% (163) |
| High School Diploma | 12.6% (916) | 3.8% (1,134) |
| Less than High School | 10.0% (732) | 2.9% (865) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.1% (1,175) | 61.9% (18,517) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richland vs Saratoga
- A higher percentage of residents in Richland have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.5% in Saratoga.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richland hold a high school diploma at 12.6% compared to 3.8% in Saratoga.
- More residents in Richland have less than a high school education at 10.0% compared to 2.9% in Saratoga.
- In Saratoga, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 61.9% compared to 16.1% in Richland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.