Demographics details for Richland, MS vs Oakhurst, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richland, MS vs Oakhurst, NJ.
| Data | Richland | Oakhurst |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,297 | 3,912 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $54,753 | $130,313 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 3% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Richland vs Oakhurst
- In Richland, the population is higher at 7,297, compared to 3,912 in Oakhurst.
- Residents in Richland have a higher median age of 37.1 years compared to 37.0 years in Oakhurst.
- Oakhurst has a higher median income of $130,313, compared to $54,753 in Richland.
- In Oakhurst, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 40.0% in Richland.
- Richland has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 3% in Oakhurst.
- The unemployment rate in Richland is higher at 4.2%, compared to 4.1% in Oakhurst.
Demographics
Demographics Richland vs Oakhurst provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Richland | Oakhurst |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 19 | 5 |
| White | 74 | 78 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Richland vs Oakhurst
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Richland at 19% compared to 5% in Oakhurst.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Oakhurst at 78% compared to 74% in Richland.
- The Asian population is larger in Richland at 2% compared to 1% in Oakhurst.
- Oakhurst has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 3% in Richland.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Oakhurst at 12%, compared to 2% in Richland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Richland and Oakhurst at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Richland | Oakhurst |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 14.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 8.6% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 20.9% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 12.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 26.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richland vs Oakhurst
- More residents in Richland report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 14.8% in Oakhurst.
- Depression is more prevalent in Richland at 23.4% compared to 20.9% in Oakhurst.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Richland at 19.3% compared to 12.4% in Oakhurst.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Oakhurst at 19.8% compared to 14.2% in Richland.
- Obesity rates are higher in Richland at 37.4% compared to 26.2% in Oakhurst.
- Disability percentages are higher in Richland at 13.0% compared to 6.0% in Oakhurst.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Richland | Oakhurst |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (122) | 0.0% (1) |
| High School Diploma | 12.6% (916) | 13.8% (538) |
| Less than High School | 10.0% (732) | 3.6% (142) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.1% (1,175) | 28.5% (1,115) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richland vs Oakhurst
- A higher percentage of residents in Richland have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Oakhurst.
- In Oakhurst, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.8% compared to 12.6% in Richland.
- More residents in Richland have less than a high school education at 10.0% compared to 3.6% in Oakhurst.
- In Oakhurst, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.5% compared to 16.1% in Richland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.