Demographics details for Richland, MS vs Galveston, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richland, MS vs Galveston, TX.
| Data | Richland | Galveston |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,297 | 53,089 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 39.4 years |
| Median Income | $54,753 | $57,453 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Richland vs Galveston
- The population in Galveston is higher at 53,089, compared to 7,297 in Richland.
- The median age in Galveston is higher at 39.4 years, compared to 37.1 years in Richland.
- Galveston has a higher median income of $57,453, compared to $54,753 in Richland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Richland at 40.0% compared to 34.0% in Galveston.
- The poverty level is higher in Galveston at 16%, compared to 12% in Richland.
- Galveston has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 4.2% in Richland.
Demographics
Demographics Richland vs Galveston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Richland | Galveston |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 19 | 16 |
| White | 74 | 37 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Richland vs Galveston
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Richland at 19% compared to 16% in Galveston.
- Richland has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 37% in Galveston.
- In Galveston, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Richland.
- Galveston has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 3% in Richland.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Galveston at 13%, compared to 2% in Richland.
- In Galveston, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Richland.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Richland | Galveston |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 21.7% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 16.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richland vs Galveston
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Richland and Galveston at 16.9%.
- Depression is more prevalent in Richland at 23.4% compared to 21.7% in Galveston.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Richland at 19.3% compared to 16.9% in Galveston.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Galveston at 16.8% compared to 14.2% in Richland.
- Both cities have the same obesity rates at 37.4%.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Galveston at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Richland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Richland | Galveston |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (122) | 1.6% (823) |
| High School Diploma | 12.6% (916) | 13.8% (7,336) |
| Less than High School | 10.0% (732) | 16.6% (8,791) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.1% (1,175) | 23.2% (12,311) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richland vs Galveston
- A higher percentage of residents in Richland have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.6% in Galveston.
- In Galveston, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.8% compared to 12.6% in Richland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Galveston at 16.6%, compared to 10.0% in Richland.
- In Galveston, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.2% compared to 16.1% in Richland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.