Demographics details for Richland, MS vs Fernley, NV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richland, MS vs Fernley, NV.
| Data | Richland | Fernley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,297 | 24,261 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 35.9 years |
| Median Income | $54,753 | $84,025 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Richland vs Fernley
- The population in Fernley is higher at 24,261, compared to 7,297 in Richland.
- Residents in Richland have a higher median age of 37.1 years compared to 35.9 years in Fernley.
- Fernley has a higher median income of $84,025, compared to $54,753 in Richland.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Richland and Fernley at 40.0%.
- Richland has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Fernley.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Richland and Fernley at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Richland vs Fernley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Richland | Fernley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 19 | 2 |
| White | 74 | 68 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Richland vs Fernley
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Richland at 19% compared to 2% in Fernley.
- Richland has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 68% in Fernley.
- The Asian population is larger in Richland at 2% compared to 1% in Fernley.
- Fernley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 3% in Richland.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fernley at 10%, compared to 2% in Richland.
- In Fernley, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Richland.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Richland | Fernley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 19.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 36.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richland vs Fernley
- In Fernley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 16.9% in Richland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Richland at 23.4% compared to 22.3% in Fernley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Richland at 19.3% compared to 19.2% in Fernley.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fernley at 17.4% compared to 14.2% in Richland.
- Obesity rates are higher in Richland at 37.4% compared to 36.1% in Fernley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Richland at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Fernley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Richland | Fernley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (122) | 1.0% (237) |
| High School Diploma | 12.6% (916) | 19.6% (4,750) |
| Less than High School | 10.0% (732) | 12.9% (3,133) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.1% (1,175) | 9.7% (2,351) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richland vs Fernley
- A higher percentage of residents in Richland have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.0% in Fernley.
- In Fernley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.6% compared to 12.6% in Richland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fernley at 12.9%, compared to 10.0% in Richland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.1% compared to 9.7% in Fernley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.