Demographics details for Richland, MS vs Chewelah, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richland, MS vs Chewelah, WA.
| Data | Richland | Chewelah |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,297 | 2,570 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 49.0 years |
| Median Income | $54,753 | $52,905 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Richland vs Chewelah
- In Richland, the population is higher at 7,297, compared to 2,570 in Chewelah.
- The median age in Chewelah is higher at 49.0 years, compared to 37.1 years in Richland.
- Richland has a higher median income of $54,753 compared to $52,905 in Chewelah.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Richland at 40.0% compared to 39.0% in Chewelah.
- Richland has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Chewelah.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Richland and Chewelah at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Richland vs Chewelah provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Richland | Chewelah |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 19 | Data is updating |
| White | 74 | 90 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Richland vs Chewelah
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Richland at 19% compared to 0% in Chewelah.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chewelah at 90% compared to 74% in Richland.
- The Asian population is larger in Richland at 2% compared to 0% in Chewelah.
- Chewelah has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 3% in Richland.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chewelah at 5%, compared to 2% in Richland.
- In Chewelah, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Richland.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Richland | Chewelah |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 20.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 14.1% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 29.5% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 19.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 33.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richland vs Chewelah
- In Chewelah, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 16.9% in Richland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chewelah at 29.5% versus 23.4% in Richland.
- Chewelah has a higher smoking rate at 19.7% compared to 19.3% in Richland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chewelah at 15.6% compared to 14.2% in Richland.
- Obesity rates are higher in Richland at 37.4% compared to 33.7% in Chewelah.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chewelah at 22.0% compared to 13.0% in Richland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Richland | Chewelah |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (122) | 0.4% (10) |
| High School Diploma | 12.6% (916) | 20.3% (522) |
| Less than High School | 10.0% (732) | 12.3% (316) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.1% (1,175) | 14.5% (373) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richland vs Chewelah
- A higher percentage of residents in Richland have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.4% in Chewelah.
- In Chewelah, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.3% compared to 12.6% in Richland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chewelah at 12.3%, compared to 10.0% in Richland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.1% compared to 14.5% in Chewelah.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.