Demographics details for Richland, MS vs Bonita springs, FL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Richland, MS vs Bonita springs, FL.

Data Richland Bonita springs
Population 7,297 56,370
Median Age 37.1 years 60.2 years
Median Income $54,753 $84,668
Married Families 40.0% 54.0%
Poverty Level 12% 8%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.1

Population Comparison: Richland vs Bonita springs

  • The population in Bonita springs is higher at 56,370, compared to 7,297 in Richland.
  • The median age in Bonita springs is higher at 60.2 years, compared to 37.1 years in Richland.
  • Bonita springs has a higher median income of $84,668, compared to $54,753 in Richland.
  • In Bonita springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 40.0% in Richland.
  • Richland has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Bonita springs.
  • The unemployment rate in Richland is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.1% in Bonita springs.

Demographics

Demographics Richland vs Bonita springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Richland Bonita springs
Black 19 2
White 74 68
Asian 2 1
Hispanic 3 21
Two or More Races 2 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Richland vs Bonita springs

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Richland at 19% compared to 2% in Bonita springs.
  • Richland has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 68% in Bonita springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Richland at 2% compared to 1% in Bonita springs.
  • Bonita springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 3% in Richland.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bonita springs at 8%, compared to 2% in Richland.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Richland and Bonita springs at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Richland Bonita springs
Mental Health Not Good 16.9% 14.4%
Physical Health Not Good 11.7% 9.7%
Depression 23.4% 17.7%
Smoking 19.3% 16.1%
Binge Drinking 14.2% 18.1%
Obesity 37.4% 26.1%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Richland vs Bonita springs

  • More residents in Richland report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 14.4% in Bonita springs.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Richland at 23.4% compared to 17.7% in Bonita springs.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Richland at 19.3% compared to 16.1% in Bonita springs.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Bonita springs at 18.1% compared to 14.2% in Richland.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Richland at 37.4% compared to 26.1% in Bonita springs.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Richland at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Bonita springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Richland Bonita springs
No Schooling 1.7% (122) 1.4% (810)
High School Diploma 12.6% (916) 14.9% (8,384)
Less than High School 10.0% (732) 15.7% (8,845)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.1% (1,175) 33.1% (18,684)

Education Levels Comparison: Richland vs Bonita springs

  • A higher percentage of residents in Richland have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.4% in Bonita springs.
  • In Bonita springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.9% compared to 12.6% in Richland.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bonita springs at 15.7%, compared to 10.0% in Richland.
  • In Bonita springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.1% compared to 16.1% in Richland.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.