Demographics details for Richland, MS vs American fork, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richland, MS vs American fork, UT.
| Data | Richland | American fork |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,297 | 37,268 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 28.0 years |
| Median Income | $54,753 | $90,490 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Richland vs American fork
- The population in American fork is higher at 37,268, compared to 7,297 in Richland.
- Residents in Richland have a higher median age of 37.1 years compared to 28.0 years in American fork.
- American fork has a higher median income of $90,490, compared to $54,753 in Richland.
- In American fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 40.0% in Richland.
- Richland has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in American fork.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Richland and American fork at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Richland vs American fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Richland | American fork |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 19 | Data is updating |
| White | 74 | 84 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Richland vs American fork
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Richland at 19% compared to 0% in American fork.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in American fork at 84% compared to 74% in Richland.
- The Asian population is larger in Richland at 2% compared to 1% in American fork.
- American fork has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 3% in Richland.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in American fork at 6%, compared to 2% in Richland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Richland and American fork at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Richland | American fork |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 9.8% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 6.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 8.5% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 29.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richland vs American fork
- More residents in Richland report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 14.2% in American fork.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 23.4%.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Richland at 19.3% compared to 6.7% in American fork.
- Binge drinking is more common in Richland at 14.2% compared to 8.5% in American fork.
- Obesity rates are higher in Richland at 37.4% compared to 29.5% in American fork.
- Disability percentages are higher in Richland at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in American fork.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Richland | American fork |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (122) | 0.6% (208) |
| High School Diploma | 12.6% (916) | 7.4% (2,742) |
| Less than High School | 10.0% (732) | 5.7% (2,134) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.1% (1,175) | 21.3% (7,922) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richland vs American fork
- A higher percentage of residents in Richland have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.6% in American fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richland hold a high school diploma at 12.6% compared to 7.4% in American fork.
- More residents in Richland have less than a high school education at 10.0% compared to 5.7% in American fork.
- In American fork, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 16.1% in Richland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.