Demographics details for Richardson, TX vs Woodstock, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richardson, TX vs Woodstock, GA.
| Data | Richardson | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 118,802 | 37,350 |
| Median Age | 34.5 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $94,362 | $100,913 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Richardson vs Woodstock
- In Richardson, the population is higher at 118,802, compared to 37,350 in Woodstock.
- The median age in Woodstock is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 34.5 years in Richardson.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $100,913, compared to $94,362 in Richardson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Richardson at 41.0% compared to 40.0% in Woodstock.
- Richardson has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 5% in Woodstock.
- The unemployment rate in Richardson is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.4% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics Richardson vs Woodstock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Richardson | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 12 | 11 |
| White | 49 | 69 |
| Asian | 15 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Richardson vs Woodstock
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Richardson at 12% compared to 11% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Woodstock at 69% compared to 49% in Richardson.
- The Asian population is larger in Richardson at 15% compared to 3% in Woodstock.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Richardson at 17% compared to 9% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodstock at 8%, compared to 7% in Richardson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Richardson and Woodstock at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Richardson | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 14.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 20.8% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 12.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 28.2% | 30.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richardson vs Woodstock
- More residents in Richardson report poor mental health at 14.4% compared to 14.1% in Woodstock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Richardson at 20.9% compared to 20.8% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher smoking rate at 12.1% compared to 11.8% in Richardson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Richardson at 18.3% compared to 16.5% in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has higher obesity rates at 30.2% compared to 28.2% in Richardson.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Richardson and Woodstock at 9.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Richardson | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (1,646) | 0.3% (107) |
| High School Diploma | 6.8% (8,041) | 8.2% (3,052) |
| Less than High School | 8.4% (10,002) | 3.7% (1,375) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.7% (43,584) | 32.9% (12,290) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richardson vs Woodstock
- A higher percentage of residents in Richardson have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.3% in Woodstock.
- In Woodstock, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 8.2% compared to 6.8% in Richardson.
- More residents in Richardson have less than a high school education at 8.4% compared to 3.7% in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richardson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.7% compared to 32.9% in Woodstock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.