Demographics details for Richardson, TX vs Monroe, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richardson, TX vs Monroe, LA.
| Data | Richardson | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 118,802 | 46,820 |
| Median Age | 34.5 years | 34.3 years |
| Median Income | $94,362 | $36,550 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 24% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: Richardson vs Monroe
- In Richardson, the population is higher at 118,802, compared to 46,820 in Monroe.
- Residents in Richardson have a higher median age of 34.5 years compared to 34.3 years in Monroe.
- Richardson has a higher median income of $94,362 compared to $36,550 in Monroe.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Richardson at 41.0% compared to 23.0% in Monroe.
- The poverty level is higher in Monroe at 24%, compared to 6% in Richardson.
- Monroe has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 3.9% in Richardson.
Demographics
Demographics Richardson vs Monroe provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Richardson | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 12 | 62 |
| White | 49 | 33 |
| Asian | 15 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Richardson vs Monroe
- In Monroe, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 62% compared to 12% in Richardson.
- Richardson has a higher percentage of White residents at 49% compared to 33% in Monroe.
- The Asian population is larger in Richardson at 15% compared to 2% in Monroe.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Richardson at 17% compared to 2% in Monroe.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Richardson at 7% compared to 1% in Monroe.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Richardson and Monroe at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Richardson | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 21.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 16.0% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 23.8% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 26.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 14.3% |
| Obesity | 28.2% | 41.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richardson vs Monroe
- In Monroe, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 14.4% in Richardson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Monroe at 23.8% versus 20.9% in Richardson.
- Monroe has a higher smoking rate at 26.0% compared to 11.8% in Richardson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Richardson at 18.3% compared to 14.3% in Monroe.
- Monroe has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 28.2% in Richardson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Monroe at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Richardson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Richardson | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (1,646) | 0.7% (320) |
| High School Diploma | 6.8% (8,041) | 16.8% (7,877) |
| Less than High School | 8.4% (10,002) | 10.9% (5,106) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.7% (43,584) | 17.1% (8,014) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richardson vs Monroe
- A higher percentage of residents in Richardson have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.7% in Monroe.
- In Monroe, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.8% compared to 6.8% in Richardson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Monroe at 10.9%, compared to 8.4% in Richardson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richardson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.7% compared to 17.1% in Monroe.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.