Demographics details for Richardson, TX vs Hanover park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richardson, TX vs Hanover park, IL.
Data | Richardson | Hanover park |
---|---|---|
Population | 118,802 | 36,376 |
Median Age | 34.5 years | 34.7 years |
Median Income | $94,362 | $88,460 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Richardson vs Hanover park
- In Richardson, the population is higher at 118,802, compared to 36,376 in Hanover park.
- The median age in Hanover park is higher at 34.7 years, compared to 34.5 years in Richardson.
- Richardson has a higher median income of $94,362 compared to $88,460 in Hanover park.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Richardson at 41.0% compared to 39.0% in Hanover park.
- The poverty level is identical in both Richardson and Hanover park at 6%.
- Hanover park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 3.9% in Richardson.
Demographics
Demographics Richardson vs Hanover park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Richardson | Hanover park |
---|---|---|
Black | 12 | 8 |
White | 49 | 17 |
Asian | 15 | 20 |
Hispanic | 17 | 39 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 15 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Richardson vs Hanover park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Richardson at 12% compared to 8% in Hanover park.
- Richardson has a higher percentage of White residents at 49% compared to 17% in Hanover park.
- In Hanover park, the Asian population stands at 20%, greater than 15% in Richardson.
- Hanover park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 39%, compared to 17% in Richardson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hanover park at 15%, compared to 7% in Richardson.
- In Hanover park, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Richardson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Richardson | Hanover park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 13.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 9.9% |
Depression | 20.9% | 16.1% |
Smoking | 11.8% | 13.1% |
Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 16.4% |
Obesity | 28.2% | 30.5% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richardson vs Hanover park
- More residents in Richardson report poor mental health at 14.4% compared to 13.2% in Hanover park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Richardson at 20.9% compared to 16.1% in Hanover park.
- Hanover park has a higher smoking rate at 13.1% compared to 11.8% in Richardson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Richardson at 18.3% compared to 16.4% in Hanover park.
- Hanover park has higher obesity rates at 30.5% compared to 28.2% in Richardson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Richardson at 9.0% compared to 8.0% in Hanover park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Richardson | Hanover park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (1,646) | 2.1% (758) |
High School Diploma | 6.8% (8,041) | 16.2% (5,894) |
Less than High School | 8.4% (10,002) | 21.1% (7,688) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.7% (43,584) | 18.0% (6,537) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richardson vs Hanover park
- In Hanover park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 1.4% in Richardson.
- In Hanover park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.2% compared to 6.8% in Richardson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hanover park at 21.1%, compared to 8.4% in Richardson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richardson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.7% compared to 18.0% in Hanover park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.