Demographics details for Richardson, TX vs Forest lake, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richardson, TX vs Forest lake, MN.
| Data | Richardson | Forest lake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 118,802 | 20,857 |
| Median Age | 34.5 years | 37.9 years |
| Median Income | $94,362 | $91,157 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Richardson vs Forest lake
- In Richardson, the population is higher at 118,802, compared to 20,857 in Forest lake.
- The median age in Forest lake is higher at 37.9 years, compared to 34.5 years in Richardson.
- Richardson has a higher median income of $94,362 compared to $91,157 in Forest lake.
- In Forest lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 41.0% in Richardson.
- The poverty level is identical in both Richardson and Forest lake at 6%.
- The unemployment rate in Richardson is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.2% in Forest lake.
Demographics
Demographics Richardson vs Forest lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Richardson | Forest lake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 12 | 3 |
| White | 49 | 81 |
| Asian | 15 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Richardson vs Forest lake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Richardson at 12% compared to 3% in Forest lake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Forest lake at 81% compared to 49% in Richardson.
- The Asian population is larger in Richardson at 15% compared to 4% in Forest lake.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Richardson at 17% compared to 6% in Forest lake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Richardson at 7% compared to 6% in Forest lake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Richardson and Forest lake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Richardson | Forest lake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 14.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 15.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 21.4% |
| Obesity | 28.2% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richardson vs Forest lake
- In Forest lake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.7% compared to 14.4% in Richardson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Forest lake at 24.1% versus 20.9% in Richardson.
- Forest lake has a higher smoking rate at 15.7% compared to 11.8% in Richardson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Forest lake at 21.4% compared to 18.3% in Richardson.
- Forest lake has higher obesity rates at 32.9% compared to 28.2% in Richardson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Forest lake at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Richardson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Richardson | Forest lake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (1,646) | 0.5% (101) |
| High School Diploma | 6.8% (8,041) | 14.6% (3,055) |
| Less than High School | 8.4% (10,002) | 7.7% (1,615) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.7% (43,584) | 24.6% (5,123) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richardson vs Forest lake
- A higher percentage of residents in Richardson have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.5% in Forest lake.
- In Forest lake, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.6% compared to 6.8% in Richardson.
- More residents in Richardson have less than a high school education at 8.4% compared to 7.7% in Forest lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richardson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.7% compared to 24.6% in Forest lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.