Demographics details for Richardson, TX vs Elk horn, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richardson, TX vs Elk horn, IA.
| Data | Richardson | Elk horn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 118,802 | 619 |
| Median Age | 34.5 years | 49.9 years |
| Median Income | $94,362 | $59,306 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Richardson vs Elk horn
- In Richardson, the population is higher at 118,802, compared to 619 in Elk horn.
- The median age in Elk horn is higher at 49.9 years, compared to 34.5 years in Richardson.
- Richardson has a higher median income of $94,362 compared to $59,306 in Elk horn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Richardson at 41.0% compared to 35.0% in Elk horn.
- The poverty level is higher in Elk horn at 9%, compared to 6% in Richardson.
- The unemployment rate in Richardson is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.6% in Elk horn.
Demographics
Demographics Richardson vs Elk horn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Richardson | Elk horn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 12 | Data is updating |
| White | 49 | 93 |
| Asian | 15 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 17 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Richardson vs Elk horn
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Richardson at 12% compared to 0% in Elk horn.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Elk horn at 93% compared to 49% in Richardson.
- The Asian population is larger in Richardson at 15% compared to 0% in Elk horn.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Richardson at 17% compared to 5% in Elk horn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Richardson at 7% compared to 1% in Elk horn.
- In Elk horn, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Richardson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Richardson | Elk horn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 14.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 18.0% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 16.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 22.9% |
| Obesity | 28.2% | 35.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richardson vs Elk horn
- In Elk horn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.8% compared to 14.4% in Richardson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Richardson at 20.9% compared to 18.0% in Elk horn.
- Elk horn has a higher smoking rate at 16.3% compared to 11.8% in Richardson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Elk horn at 22.9% compared to 18.3% in Richardson.
- Elk horn has higher obesity rates at 35.9% compared to 28.2% in Richardson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Richardson at 9.0% compared to 8.0% in Elk horn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Richardson | Elk horn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (1,646) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 6.8% (8,041) | 18.9% (117) |
| Less than High School | 8.4% (10,002) | 7.1% (44) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.7% (43,584) | 15.3% (95) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richardson vs Elk horn
- A higher percentage of residents in Richardson have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Elk horn.
- In Elk horn, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.9% compared to 6.8% in Richardson.
- More residents in Richardson have less than a high school education at 8.4% compared to 7.1% in Elk horn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richardson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.7% compared to 15.3% in Elk horn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.