Demographics details for Richardson, TX vs Bell gardens, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richardson, TX vs Bell gardens, CA.
| Data | Richardson | Bell gardens |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 118,802 | 37,927 |
| Median Age | 34.5 years | 31.1 years |
| Median Income | $94,362 | $53,935 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 6.7 |
Population Comparison: Richardson vs Bell gardens
- In Richardson, the population is higher at 118,802, compared to 37,927 in Bell gardens.
- Residents in Richardson have a higher median age of 34.5 years compared to 31.1 years in Bell gardens.
- Richardson has a higher median income of $94,362 compared to $53,935 in Bell gardens.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Richardson at 41.0% compared to 27.0% in Bell gardens.
- The poverty level is higher in Bell gardens at 15%, compared to 6% in Richardson.
- Bell gardens has a higher unemployment rate at 6.7% compared to 3.9% in Richardson.
Demographics
Demographics Richardson vs Bell gardens provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Richardson | Bell gardens |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 12 | 1 |
| White | 49 | -35 |
| Asian | 15 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 17 | 99 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 34 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Richardson vs Bell gardens
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Richardson at 12% compared to 1% in Bell gardens.
- Richardson has a higher percentage of White residents at 49% compared to -35% in Bell gardens.
- The Asian population is larger in Richardson at 15% compared to 0% in Bell gardens.
- Bell gardens has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 99%, compared to 17% in Richardson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bell gardens at 34%, compared to 7% in Richardson.
- In Bell gardens, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Richardson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Richardson | Bell gardens |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.9% | 17.9% |
| Depression | 20.9% | 17.5% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 16.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 13.3% |
| Obesity | 28.2% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richardson vs Bell gardens
- In Bell gardens, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 14.4% in Richardson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Richardson at 20.9% compared to 17.5% in Bell gardens.
- Bell gardens has a higher smoking rate at 16.2% compared to 11.8% in Richardson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Richardson at 18.3% compared to 13.3% in Bell gardens.
- Bell gardens has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 28.2% in Richardson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Richardson at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Bell gardens.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Richardson | Bell gardens |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (1,646) | 4.5% (1,722) |
| High School Diploma | 6.8% (8,041) | 16.9% (6,418) |
| Less than High School | 8.4% (10,002) | 60.8% (23,053) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.7% (43,584) | 3.9% (1,476) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richardson vs Bell gardens
- In Bell gardens, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.5% compared to 1.4% in Richardson.
- In Bell gardens, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.9% compared to 6.8% in Richardson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bell gardens at 60.8%, compared to 8.4% in Richardson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richardson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.7% compared to 3.9% in Bell gardens.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.