Demographics details for Rich hill, MO vs Ashburn, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rich hill, MO vs Ashburn, GA.
| Data | Rich hill | Ashburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,244 | 4,174 |
| Median Age | 41.5 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $43,205 | $35,987 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Rich hill vs Ashburn
- The population in Ashburn is higher at 4,174, compared to 1,244 in Rich hill.
- Residents in Rich hill have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 39.9 years in Ashburn.
- Rich hill has a higher median income of $43,205 compared to $35,987 in Ashburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rich hill at 48.0% compared to 30.0% in Ashburn.
- The poverty level is identical in both Rich hill and Ashburn at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Rich hill is higher at 4.8%, compared to 4.5% in Ashburn.
Demographics
Demographics Rich hill vs Ashburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rich hill | Ashburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 71 |
| White | 91 | 22 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rich hill vs Ashburn
- In Ashburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 71% compared to 1% in Rich hill.
- Rich hill has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 22% in Ashburn.
- Both Rich hill and Ashburn have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Ashburn has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Rich hill.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rich hill at 5% compared to 2% in Ashburn.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rich hill at 1% compared to 0% in Ashburn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rich hill | Ashburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.5% | 16.1% |
| Depression | 27.2% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 25.1% | 24.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 12.1% |
| Obesity | 41.0% | 43.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 25.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rich hill vs Ashburn
- In Ashburn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 19.6% in Rich hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rich hill at 27.2% compared to 21.2% in Ashburn.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rich hill at 25.1% compared to 24.2% in Ashburn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rich hill at 16.8% compared to 12.1% in Ashburn.
- Ashburn has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 41.0% in Rich hill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rich hill at 25.0% compared to 18.0% in Ashburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rich hill | Ashburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (17) | 0.2% (8) |
| High School Diploma | 29.9% (372) | 19.0% (791) |
| Less than High School | 42.6% (530) | 21.0% (875) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.4% (92) | 7.3% (304) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rich hill vs Ashburn
- A higher percentage of residents in Rich hill have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.2% in Ashburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rich hill hold a high school diploma at 29.9% compared to 19.0% in Ashburn.
- More residents in Rich hill have less than a high school education at 42.6% compared to 21.0% in Ashburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rich hill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.4% compared to 7.3% in Ashburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.