Demographics details for Rich hill, MO vs Adamsburg, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rich hill, MO vs Adamsburg, PA.
| Data | Rich hill | Adamsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,244 | 143 |
| Median Age | 41.5 years | 27.6 years |
| Median Income | $43,205 | $71,429 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 22.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Rich hill vs Adamsburg
- In Rich hill, the population is higher at 1,244, compared to 143 in Adamsburg.
- Residents in Rich hill have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 27.6 years in Adamsburg.
- Adamsburg has a higher median income of $71,429, compared to $43,205 in Rich hill.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rich hill at 48.0% compared to 22.0% in Adamsburg.
- Rich hill has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Adamsburg.
- The unemployment rate in Rich hill is higher at 4.8%, compared to 3.1% in Adamsburg.
Demographics
Demographics Rich hill vs Adamsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rich hill | Adamsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 91 | 92 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Rich hill vs Adamsburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rich hill at 1% compared to 0% in Adamsburg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Adamsburg at 92% compared to 91% in Rich hill.
- Both Rich hill and Adamsburg have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rich hill at 2% compared to 0% in Adamsburg.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Adamsburg at 7%, compared to 5% in Rich hill.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rich hill and Adamsburg at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rich hill | Adamsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.5% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 27.2% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 25.1% | 19.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 19.3% |
| Obesity | 41.0% | 34.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 25.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rich hill vs Adamsburg
- More residents in Rich hill report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 17.9% in Adamsburg.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rich hill at 27.2% compared to 22.6% in Adamsburg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rich hill at 25.1% compared to 19.8% in Adamsburg.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Adamsburg at 19.3% compared to 16.8% in Rich hill.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rich hill at 41.0% compared to 34.1% in Adamsburg.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rich hill at 25.0% compared to 15.0% in Adamsburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rich hill | Adamsburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (17) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 29.9% (372) | 19.6% (28) |
| Less than High School | 42.6% (530) | 2.8% (4) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.4% (92) | 7.0% (10) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rich hill vs Adamsburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Rich hill have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Adamsburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rich hill hold a high school diploma at 29.9% compared to 19.6% in Adamsburg.
- More residents in Rich hill have less than a high school education at 42.6% compared to 2.8% in Adamsburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rich hill hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.4% compared to 7.0% in Adamsburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.