Demographics details for Riceville, IA vs Keyport, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Riceville, IA vs Keyport, WA.
Data | Riceville | Keyport |
---|---|---|
Population | 803 | 284 |
Median Age | 36.3 years | 57.0 years |
Median Income | $48,009 | $128,221 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 58.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Riceville vs Keyport
- In Riceville, the population is higher at 803, compared to 284 in Keyport.
- The median age in Keyport is higher at 57.0 years, compared to 36.3 years in Riceville.
- Keyport has a higher median income of $128,221, compared to $48,009 in Riceville.
- In Keyport, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 41.0% in Riceville.
- Riceville has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Keyport.
- Keyport has a higher unemployment rate at 3.0% compared to 2.5% in Riceville.
Demographics
Demographics Riceville vs Keyport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Riceville | Keyport |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 87 | 95 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 10 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 3 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Riceville vs Keyport
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Riceville and Keyport at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Keyport at 95% compared to 87% in Riceville.
- Both Riceville and Keyport have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Riceville at 10% compared to 5% in Keyport.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Riceville at 3% compared to 0% in Keyport.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Riceville and Keyport at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Riceville | Keyport |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 14.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 9.2% |
Depression | 20.0% | 26.4% |
Smoking | 20.3% | 11.5% |
Binge Drinking | 21.2% | 18.9% |
Obesity | 38.2% | 30.8% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Riceville vs Keyport
- More residents in Riceville report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 14.9% in Keyport.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Keyport at 26.4% versus 20.0% in Riceville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Riceville at 20.3% compared to 11.5% in Keyport.
- Binge drinking is more common in Riceville at 21.2% compared to 18.9% in Keyport.
- Obesity rates are higher in Riceville at 38.2% compared to 30.8% in Keyport.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Keyport at 24.0% compared to 15.0% in Riceville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Riceville | Keyport |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (1) | 6.0% (17) |
High School Diploma | 27.9% (224) | 8.8% (25) |
Less than High School | 9.5% (76) | 12.0% (34) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.6% (133) | 37.3% (106) |
Education Levels Comparison: Riceville vs Keyport
- In Keyport, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 6.0% compared to 0.1% in Riceville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Riceville hold a high school diploma at 27.9% compared to 8.8% in Keyport.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Keyport at 12.0%, compared to 9.5% in Riceville.
- In Keyport, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.3% compared to 16.6% in Riceville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.