Demographics details for Riceville, IA vs Fort washington, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Riceville, IA vs Fort washington, MD.
| Data | Riceville | Fort washington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 803 | 25,825 |
| Median Age | 36.3 years | 44.1 years |
| Median Income | $48,009 | $143,623 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Riceville vs Fort washington
- The population in Fort washington is higher at 25,825, compared to 803 in Riceville.
- The median age in Fort washington is higher at 44.1 years, compared to 36.3 years in Riceville.
- Fort washington has a higher median income of $143,623, compared to $48,009 in Riceville.
- In Fort washington, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 41.0% in Riceville.
- Riceville has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Fort washington.
- Fort washington has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Riceville.
Demographics
Demographics Riceville vs Fort washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Riceville | Fort washington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 61 |
| White | 87 | 8 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 8 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Riceville vs Fort washington
- In Fort washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 61% compared to 0% in Riceville.
- Riceville has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 8% in Fort washington.
- In Fort washington, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 0% in Riceville.
- Fort washington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 10% in Riceville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort washington at 6%, compared to 3% in Riceville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Riceville and Fort washington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Riceville | Fort washington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 12.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 7.9% |
| Depression | 20.0% | 11.6% |
| Smoking | 20.3% | 9.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.2% | 12.0% |
| Obesity | 38.2% | 37.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Riceville vs Fort washington
- More residents in Riceville report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 12.5% in Fort washington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Riceville at 20.0% compared to 11.6% in Fort washington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Riceville at 20.3% compared to 9.6% in Fort washington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Riceville at 21.2% compared to 12.0% in Fort washington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Riceville at 38.2% compared to 37.7% in Fort washington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Riceville at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Fort washington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Riceville | Fort washington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (1) | 1.2% (297) |
| High School Diploma | 27.9% (224) | 14.4% (3,710) |
| Less than High School | 9.5% (76) | 8.3% (2,138) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.6% (133) | 31.8% (8,208) |
Education Levels Comparison: Riceville vs Fort washington
- In Fort washington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.1% in Riceville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Riceville hold a high school diploma at 27.9% compared to 14.4% in Fort washington.
- More residents in Riceville have less than a high school education at 9.5% compared to 8.3% in Fort washington.
- In Fort washington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 16.6% in Riceville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.