Demographics details for Rialto, CA vs Saint marks, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rialto, CA vs Saint marks, FL.
Data | Rialto | Saint marks |
---|---|---|
Population | 103,545 | 295 |
Median Age | 31.2 years | 60.1 years |
Median Income | $80,750 | $47,500 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 51.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Rialto vs Saint marks
- In Rialto, the population is higher at 103,545, compared to 295 in Saint marks.
- The median age in Saint marks is higher at 60.1 years, compared to 31.2 years in Rialto.
- Rialto has a higher median income of $80,750 compared to $47,500 in Saint marks.
- In Saint marks, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 33.0% in Rialto.
- Rialto has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 0% in Saint marks.
- The unemployment rate in Rialto is higher at 5.7%, compared to 4.5% in Saint marks.
Demographics
Demographics Rialto vs Saint marks provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Rialto | Saint marks |
---|---|---|
Black | 12 | Data is updating |
White | -7 | 98 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 75 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 17 | 2 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rialto vs Saint marks
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rialto at 12% compared to 0% in Saint marks.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Saint marks at 98% compared to -7% in Rialto.
- The Asian population is larger in Rialto at 2% compared to 0% in Saint marks.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rialto at 75% compared to 0% in Saint marks.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rialto at 17% compared to 2% in Saint marks.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rialto at 1% compared to 0% in Saint marks.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Rialto | Saint marks |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 18.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 12.7% |
Depression | 17.5% | 23.2% |
Smoking | 13.8% | 25.2% |
Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 17.4% |
Obesity | 41.1% | 31.9% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rialto vs Saint marks
- In Saint marks, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 17.1% in Rialto.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Saint marks at 23.2% versus 17.5% in Rialto.
- Saint marks has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 13.8% in Rialto.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Saint marks at 17.4% compared to 14.8% in Rialto.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rialto at 41.1% compared to 31.9% in Saint marks.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Saint marks at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Rialto.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Rialto | Saint marks |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.7% (2,754) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 18.6% (19,301) | 23.7% (70) |
Less than High School | 30.0% (31,028) | 9.5% (28) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.5% (7,751) | 4.1% (12) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rialto vs Saint marks
- A higher percentage of residents in Rialto have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Saint marks.
- In Saint marks, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.7% compared to 18.6% in Rialto.
- More residents in Rialto have less than a high school education at 30.0% compared to 9.5% in Saint marks.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rialto hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.5% compared to 4.1% in Saint marks.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.