Demographics details for Rialto, CA vs Maple falls, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rialto, CA vs Maple falls, WA.
| Data | Rialto | Maple falls |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 103,545 | 231 |
| Median Age | 31.2 years | 61.4 years |
| Median Income | $80,750 | $32,226 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 49.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | Data is updating |
Population Comparison: Rialto vs Maple falls
- In Rialto, the population is higher at 103,545, compared to 231 in Maple falls.
- The median age in Maple falls is higher at 61.4 years, compared to 31.2 years in Rialto.
- Rialto has a higher median income of $80,750 compared to $32,226 in Maple falls.
- In Maple falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 33.0% in Rialto.
- Rialto has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 0% in Maple falls.
- The unemployment rate in Rialto is higher at 5.7%, compared to 0.0% in Maple falls.
Demographics
Demographics Rialto vs Maple falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rialto | Maple falls |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 12 | Data is updating |
| White | -7 | 94 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 75 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rialto vs Maple falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rialto at 12% compared to 0% in Maple falls.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Maple falls at 94% compared to -7% in Rialto.
- The Asian population is larger in Rialto at 2% compared to 0% in Maple falls.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rialto at 75% compared to 6% in Maple falls.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rialto at 17% compared to 0% in Maple falls.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rialto at 1% compared to 0% in Maple falls.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rialto | Maple falls |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 19.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 17.5% | 31.8% |
| Smoking | 13.8% | 19.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 41.1% | 28.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 68.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rialto vs Maple falls
- In Maple falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 17.1% in Rialto.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Maple falls at 31.8% versus 17.5% in Rialto.
- Maple falls has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 13.8% in Rialto.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Maple falls at 17.9% compared to 14.8% in Rialto.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rialto at 41.1% compared to 28.1% in Maple falls.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Maple falls at 68.0% compared to 9.0% in Rialto.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rialto | Maple falls |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (2,754) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 18.6% (19,301) | 40.7% (94) |
| Less than High School | 30.0% (31,028) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.5% (7,751) | 8.7% (20) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rialto vs Maple falls
- A higher percentage of residents in Rialto have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Maple falls.
- In Maple falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 40.7% compared to 18.6% in Rialto.
- More residents in Rialto have less than a high school education at 30.0% compared to 0.0% in Maple falls.
- In Maple falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.7% compared to 7.5% in Rialto.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.