Demographics details for Rialto, CA vs Laurelville, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rialto, CA vs Laurelville, OH.
Data | Rialto | Laurelville |
---|---|---|
Population | 103,545 | 506 |
Median Age | 31.2 years | 36.1 years |
Median Income | $80,750 | $50,357 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Rialto vs Laurelville
- In Rialto, the population is higher at 103,545, compared to 506 in Laurelville.
- The median age in Laurelville is higher at 36.1 years, compared to 31.2 years in Rialto.
- Rialto has a higher median income of $80,750 compared to $50,357 in Laurelville.
- In Laurelville, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 33.0% in Rialto.
- Rialto has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 12% in Laurelville.
- The unemployment rate in Rialto is higher at 5.7%, compared to 3.5% in Laurelville.
Demographics
Demographics Rialto vs Laurelville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Rialto | Laurelville |
---|---|---|
Black | 12 | Data is updating |
White | -7 | 88 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 75 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 17 | 12 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rialto vs Laurelville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rialto at 12% compared to 0% in Laurelville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Laurelville at 88% compared to -7% in Rialto.
- The Asian population is larger in Rialto at 2% compared to 0% in Laurelville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rialto at 75% compared to 0% in Laurelville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rialto at 17% compared to 12% in Laurelville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rialto at 1% compared to 0% in Laurelville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Rialto | Laurelville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 20.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 14.8% |
Depression | 17.5% | 26.8% |
Smoking | 13.8% | 27.9% |
Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 17.0% |
Obesity | 41.1% | 45.9% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rialto vs Laurelville
- In Laurelville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 17.1% in Rialto.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Laurelville at 26.8% versus 17.5% in Rialto.
- Laurelville has a higher smoking rate at 27.9% compared to 13.8% in Rialto.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Laurelville at 17.0% compared to 14.8% in Rialto.
- Laurelville has higher obesity rates at 45.9% compared to 41.1% in Rialto.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Laurelville at 20.0% compared to 9.0% in Rialto.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Rialto | Laurelville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.7% (2,754) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 18.6% (19,301) | 41.5% (210) |
Less than High School | 30.0% (31,028) | 18.2% (92) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.5% (7,751) | 2.8% (14) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rialto vs Laurelville
- A higher percentage of residents in Rialto have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Laurelville.
- In Laurelville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 41.5% compared to 18.6% in Rialto.
- More residents in Rialto have less than a high school education at 30.0% compared to 18.2% in Laurelville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rialto hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.5% compared to 2.8% in Laurelville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.