Demographics details for Rialto, CA vs Honea path, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rialto, CA vs Honea path, SC.
Data | Rialto | Honea path |
---|---|---|
Population | 103,545 | 3,788 |
Median Age | 31.2 years | 46.5 years |
Median Income | $80,750 | $50,375 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Rialto vs Honea path
- In Rialto, the population is higher at 103,545, compared to 3,788 in Honea path.
- The median age in Honea path is higher at 46.5 years, compared to 31.2 years in Rialto.
- Rialto has a higher median income of $80,750 compared to $50,375 in Honea path.
- In Honea path, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 33.0% in Rialto.
- Rialto has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 15% in Honea path.
- The unemployment rate in Rialto is higher at 5.7%, compared to 3.5% in Honea path.
Demographics
Demographics Rialto vs Honea path provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Rialto | Honea path |
---|---|---|
Black | 12 | 12 |
White | -7 | 84 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 75 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 17 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rialto vs Honea path
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Rialto and Honea path at 12%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Honea path at 84% compared to -7% in Rialto.
- The Asian population is larger in Rialto at 2% compared to 0% in Honea path.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rialto at 75% compared to 0% in Honea path.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rialto at 17% compared to 4% in Honea path.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rialto at 1% compared to 0% in Honea path.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Rialto | Honea path |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 18.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 12.7% |
Depression | 17.5% | 23.6% |
Smoking | 13.8% | 19.7% |
Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 17.1% |
Obesity | 41.1% | 37.2% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rialto vs Honea path
- In Honea path, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 17.1% in Rialto.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Honea path at 23.6% versus 17.5% in Rialto.
- Honea path has a higher smoking rate at 19.7% compared to 13.8% in Rialto.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Honea path at 17.1% compared to 14.8% in Rialto.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rialto at 41.1% compared to 37.2% in Honea path.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Honea path at 25.0% compared to 9.0% in Rialto.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Rialto | Honea path |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.7% (2,754) | 1.2% (46) |
High School Diploma | 18.6% (19,301) | 17.6% (667) |
Less than High School | 30.0% (31,028) | 22.2% (841) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.5% (7,751) | 16.0% (606) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rialto vs Honea path
- A higher percentage of residents in Rialto have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.2% in Honea path.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rialto hold a high school diploma at 18.6% compared to 17.6% in Honea path.
- More residents in Rialto have less than a high school education at 30.0% compared to 22.2% in Honea path.
- In Honea path, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 7.5% in Rialto.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.