Demographics details for Rialto, CA vs Harpers ferry, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rialto, CA vs Harpers ferry, IA.
Data | Rialto | Harpers ferry |
---|---|---|
Population | 103,545 | 262 |
Median Age | 31.2 years | 65.3 years |
Median Income | $80,750 | $38,750 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 48.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Rialto vs Harpers ferry
- In Rialto, the population is higher at 103,545, compared to 262 in Harpers ferry.
- The median age in Harpers ferry is higher at 65.3 years, compared to 31.2 years in Rialto.
- Rialto has a higher median income of $80,750 compared to $38,750 in Harpers ferry.
- In Harpers ferry, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 33.0% in Rialto.
- Rialto has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 6% in Harpers ferry.
- The unemployment rate in Rialto is higher at 5.7%, compared to 3.5% in Harpers ferry.
Demographics
Demographics Rialto vs Harpers ferry provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Rialto | Harpers ferry |
---|---|---|
Black | 12 | Data is updating |
White | -7 | 98 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 75 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 17 | 2 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rialto vs Harpers ferry
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rialto at 12% compared to 0% in Harpers ferry.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Harpers ferry at 98% compared to -7% in Rialto.
- The Asian population is larger in Rialto at 2% compared to 0% in Harpers ferry.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rialto at 75% compared to 0% in Harpers ferry.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rialto at 17% compared to 2% in Harpers ferry.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rialto at 1% compared to 0% in Harpers ferry.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Rialto | Harpers ferry |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 16.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 11.2% |
Depression | 17.5% | 19.1% |
Smoking | 13.8% | 20.8% |
Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 21.6% |
Obesity | 41.1% | 36.5% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rialto vs Harpers ferry
- More residents in Rialto report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 16.4% in Harpers ferry.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Harpers ferry at 19.1% versus 17.5% in Rialto.
- Harpers ferry has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 13.8% in Rialto.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Harpers ferry at 21.6% compared to 14.8% in Rialto.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rialto at 41.1% compared to 36.5% in Harpers ferry.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Harpers ferry at 19.0% compared to 9.0% in Rialto.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Rialto | Harpers ferry |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.7% (2,754) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 18.6% (19,301) | 22.9% (60) |
Less than High School | 30.0% (31,028) | 9.9% (26) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.5% (7,751) | 17.9% (47) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rialto vs Harpers ferry
- A higher percentage of residents in Rialto have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Harpers ferry.
- In Harpers ferry, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.9% compared to 18.6% in Rialto.
- More residents in Rialto have less than a high school education at 30.0% compared to 9.9% in Harpers ferry.
- In Harpers ferry, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.9% compared to 7.5% in Rialto.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.