Demographics details for Rialto, CA vs Gulf shores, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rialto, CA vs Gulf shores, AL.
| Data | Rialto | Gulf shores |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 103,545 | 16,193 |
| Median Age | 31.2 years | 50.4 years |
| Median Income | $80,750 | $62,021 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Rialto vs Gulf shores
- In Rialto, the population is higher at 103,545, compared to 16,193 in Gulf shores.
- The median age in Gulf shores is higher at 50.4 years, compared to 31.2 years in Rialto.
- Rialto has a higher median income of $80,750 compared to $62,021 in Gulf shores.
- In Gulf shores, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 33.0% in Rialto.
- Rialto has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 10% in Gulf shores.
- The unemployment rate in Rialto is higher at 5.7%, compared to 3.5% in Gulf shores.
Demographics
Demographics Rialto vs Gulf shores provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rialto | Gulf shores |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 12 | 2 |
| White | -7 | 92 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 75 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 1 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rialto vs Gulf shores
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rialto at 12% compared to 2% in Gulf shores.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gulf shores at 92% compared to -7% in Rialto.
- The Asian population is larger in Rialto at 2% compared to 1% in Gulf shores.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rialto at 75% compared to 4% in Gulf shores.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rialto at 17% compared to 1% in Gulf shores.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rialto at 1% compared to 0% in Gulf shores.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rialto | Gulf shores |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 17.5% | 23.3% |
| Smoking | 13.8% | 13.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 18.6% |
| Obesity | 41.1% | 35.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rialto vs Gulf shores
- More residents in Rialto report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 16.8% in Gulf shores.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gulf shores at 23.3% versus 17.5% in Rialto.
- Gulf shores has a higher smoking rate at 13.9% compared to 13.8% in Rialto.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gulf shores at 18.6% compared to 14.8% in Rialto.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rialto at 41.1% compared to 35.9% in Gulf shores.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gulf shores at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Rialto.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rialto | Gulf shores |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (2,754) | 0.3% (48) |
| High School Diploma | 18.6% (19,301) | 13.9% (2,253) |
| Less than High School | 30.0% (31,028) | 6.1% (991) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.5% (7,751) | 28.1% (4,555) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rialto vs Gulf shores
- A higher percentage of residents in Rialto have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.3% in Gulf shores.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rialto hold a high school diploma at 18.6% compared to 13.9% in Gulf shores.
- More residents in Rialto have less than a high school education at 30.0% compared to 6.1% in Gulf shores.
- In Gulf shores, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.1% compared to 7.5% in Rialto.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.