Demographics details for Rialto, CA vs Averill park, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rialto, CA vs Averill park, NY.
| Data | Rialto | Averill park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 103,545 | 1,608 |
| Median Age | 31.2 years | 53.3 years |
| Median Income | $80,750 | $109,746 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Rialto vs Averill park
- In Rialto, the population is higher at 103,545, compared to 1,608 in Averill park.
- The median age in Averill park is higher at 53.3 years, compared to 31.2 years in Rialto.
- Averill park has a higher median income of $109,746, compared to $80,750 in Rialto.
- In Averill park, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 33.0% in Rialto.
- Rialto has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 4% in Averill park.
- The unemployment rate in Rialto is higher at 5.7%, compared to 3.5% in Averill park.
Demographics
Demographics Rialto vs Averill park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rialto | Averill park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 12 | Data is updating |
| White | -7 | 100 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 75 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 17 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rialto vs Averill park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rialto at 12% compared to 0% in Averill park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Averill park at 100% compared to -7% in Rialto.
- The Asian population is larger in Rialto at 2% compared to 0% in Averill park.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rialto at 75% compared to 0% in Averill park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rialto at 17% compared to 0% in Averill park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rialto at 1% compared to 0% in Averill park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rialto | Averill park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 14.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.7% | 9.1% |
| Depression | 17.5% | 23.7% |
| Smoking | 13.8% | 15.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 21.5% |
| Obesity | 41.1% | 34.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rialto vs Averill park
- More residents in Rialto report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 14.6% in Averill park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Averill park at 23.7% versus 17.5% in Rialto.
- Averill park has a higher smoking rate at 15.9% compared to 13.8% in Rialto.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Averill park at 21.5% compared to 14.8% in Rialto.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rialto at 41.1% compared to 34.6% in Averill park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Averill park at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Rialto.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rialto | Averill park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (2,754) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 18.6% (19,301) | 22.0% (354) |
| Less than High School | 30.0% (31,028) | 3.7% (60) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.5% (7,751) | 32.3% (520) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rialto vs Averill park
- A higher percentage of residents in Rialto have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Averill park.
- In Averill park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.0% compared to 18.6% in Rialto.
- More residents in Rialto have less than a high school education at 30.0% compared to 3.7% in Averill park.
- In Averill park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.3% compared to 7.5% in Rialto.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.