Demographics details for Redwood city, CA vs Fairview, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Redwood city, CA vs Fairview, TN.
Data | Redwood city | Fairview |
---|---|---|
Population | 80,512 | 9,910 |
Median Age | 37.1 years | 34.9 years |
Median Income | $145,620 | $82,344 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Redwood city vs Fairview
- In Redwood city, the population is higher at 80,512, compared to 9,910 in Fairview.
- Residents in Redwood city have a higher median age of 37.1 years compared to 34.9 years in Fairview.
- Redwood city has a higher median income of $145,620 compared to $82,344 in Fairview.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Redwood city at 45.0% compared to 41.0% in Fairview.
- Redwood city has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Fairview.
- The unemployment rate in Redwood city is higher at 3.4%, compared to 3.1% in Fairview.
Demographics
Demographics Redwood city vs Fairview provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Redwood city | Fairview |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 4 |
White | 28 | 75 |
Asian | 17 | 1 |
Hispanic | 37 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 14 | 8 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Redwood city vs Fairview
- In Fairview, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 2% in Redwood city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fairview at 75% compared to 28% in Redwood city.
- The Asian population is larger in Redwood city at 17% compared to 1% in Fairview.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Redwood city at 37% compared to 12% in Fairview.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Redwood city at 14% compared to 8% in Fairview.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Redwood city at 2% compared to 0% in Fairview.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Redwood city | Fairview |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.7% | 17.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 11.5% |
Depression | 16.1% | 26.5% |
Smoking | 9.2% | 18.2% |
Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 16.5% |
Obesity | 24.6% | 31.4% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Redwood city vs Fairview
- In Fairview, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 13.7% in Redwood city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fairview at 26.5% versus 16.1% in Redwood city.
- Fairview has a higher smoking rate at 18.2% compared to 9.2% in Redwood city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Redwood city at 16.6% compared to 16.5% in Fairview.
- Fairview has higher obesity rates at 31.4% compared to 24.6% in Redwood city.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairview at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Redwood city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Redwood city | Fairview |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.1% (1,692) | 1.4% (134) |
High School Diploma | 10.3% (8,332) | 14.1% (1,402) |
Less than High School | 16.0% (12,887) | 8.8% (868) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 39.1% (31,469) | 21.9% (2,169) |
Education Levels Comparison: Redwood city vs Fairview
- A higher percentage of residents in Redwood city have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 1.4% in Fairview.
- In Fairview, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.1% compared to 10.3% in Redwood city.
- More residents in Redwood city have less than a high school education at 16.0% compared to 8.8% in Fairview.
- A higher percentage of residents in Redwood city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.1% compared to 21.9% in Fairview.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.